Like ink stains, blots of extremist Islamic terror are spreading across Southeast Asia, with southern Thailand as the latest target and with spurs reaching out to Australia and South Korea.
The rise of an Islamic insurgency in Thailand's Kra Isthmus, where a Muslim separatist movement has been simmering for 20 years, has the marks of a classic maneuver by al-Qaeda, the Islamic terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden. He is still at large and broadcast a vitriolic message to Americans just before the US presidential election on Nov. 2.
Al-Qaeda did not start the Muslim insurgency in Thailand, which is overwhelmingly Buddhist, but waited until it was well underway and then may have injected training, weapons, and funds into the movement through its Southeast Asian affiliate, Jemaah Islamiya. "We're watching it closely," said a US official with access to intelligence reports, "and we're hoping to learn more."
Within the last two months, Muslims extremists have repeatedly attacked Thai government offices, police stations, security forces, homes of local officials and village chiefs, and markets. Since the beginning of the year, the insurgents are reported that have killed 360 people.
In response, the Thai police have cracked down, killing 85 rioters in a raid that drew protests from the king of Thailand and the US government for being excessive. That crackdown led, in turn, to revenge bombings by the insurgents and the beheading of a Buddhist village leader.
Further escalation in the violence is expected and no end is in sight even though Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has vowed to stamp out the insurgency.
The insurgency in southern Thailand has strained relations between Thailand and Malaysia next door. The Thai government has alleged that Malaysia has provided a haven across the border for the Muslim insurgents, who are ethnic Malays. Malaysia has denied that and accused the Thai government of oppressing the Muslims in southern Thailand.
Analysts have noted that Al-Jazeera, the Islamic radio and TV network based in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar, has played up the Thai insurgency, suggesting growing links with other Islamic terrorist networks.
Meanwhile, Australian intelligence agencies have identified Muslims who were trained by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan before assaults on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on Sept. 11, 2001. Australia is home to about 340,000 Muslims, a third native-born, who comprise 4 percent of the population.
Far to the north, al-Qaeda has threatened terrorist actions in South Korea in response to the dispatch of 3,600 South Korean soldiers to Iraq alongside US and other coalition troops there. At least two such threats have been posted in recent weeks and a potential target would be US forces stationed there. About 500,000 Muslims live in South Korea.
Islamic extremist networks in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and wherever else they operate are said not to be aligned in a tightly-knit, hierarchical organization but rather to be loosely affiliated with one another as they draw financial and logistic support from al-Qaeda.
In Southeast Asia, the leading unit within this network is Jemaah Islamiya, which numbers anywhere from several hundred activists to five thousand members. Formed in the late 1990s, its avowed goal is to establish an Islamic state that would include Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, southern Thailand and the southern Philippines.
While Muslim terrorist cells are believed to exist in Malaysia, the Malaysian Special Branch of counter-terrorist operatives is said to have drawn on the experience of their predecessors who defeated Chinese guerrillas in the 1960s to keep potential terrorists at bay.
The government of Singapore, which is home to citizens of Chinese, Malay, Tamil Indian and European ancestry, is especially nervous about being swamped in a Muslim sea. That underlies the frequent plea from Singaporean leaders to the Americans: "Stick around, don't go home." Singapore has been quietly supportive of the US war on terror.
Jemaah Islamiya, sometimes known by its initials JI, was responsible for the bombing in Bali, the Indonesian island, in October 2002, and is still active there despite the capture of its leader, Riduan Issamudin, usually called Hambali, in Thailand in August last year.
Moreover, the government in the Philippines has been unable to make progress against Muslim insurgents known as Abu Sayyaf in its southern islands. It has seized several foreign tourists and held them for ransom as a way to fund its operations.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
President William Lai’s (賴清德) historic announcement on Wednesday, Nov. 26, of a supplemental defense budget valued in excess of US$40 billion is a testament to the seriousness with which Taiwan is responding to the relentless expansionist ambitions of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Communist Party and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Lai is responding to the threat posed to Taiwan sovereignty along with US President Donald Trump’s insistence that American partners in good standing must take on more responsibility for their own defense. The supplemental defense budget will be broken into three main parts. The first and largest piece