Richard Hartzell's letter has many good points and is mostly true, including the thought that the US reserves the right to recognize China but not Taiwan (Letters, Nov. 8, page 8).
The part I would quarrel with is that the US does not have the right or the ability to transfer sovereignty to Taiwan. The matter of the transfer of sovereignty over Taiwan was left out of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, and therefore has fallen to the people of Taiwan to decide. The US cannot change this, and should not meddle in the final choice of the free people of Taiwan.
The act of meddling in the final choice of the people of Taiwan would be a huge black mark on the name of the US. Mr Hartzell points out that he could find no date for when Taiwan became a sovereign nation. The date for sovereignty will be the much-feared (by China, mostly) date of the new constitution's implementation, because no state without sovereignty can implement a new constitution by it's people. Much ground needs to be covered between now and then. Security and international support are key to the process. Is Taiwan up to the task? I think it is ready for this.
Bode Bliss
Cleveland, Ohio
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS