The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) announced on Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Premier Yu Shyi-kun for libel and defamation. The suit was filed after Yu repeatedly claimed during legislative question-and-answer sessions that the KMT's assets are stolen "booty," and that whoever purchases the party's assets is buying stolen property.
According to the KMT's complaint, "The KMT assets are a legacy of history and the accumulation of years of effort. They have by no means been obtained by illegal means." Obviously, the thief still does not know what he did wrong. The KMT's wealth does in fact derive from theft. The concept of "the rule of law" did not exist during Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek's (
However, the KMT is not aware that times and the political system have changed. Under the rule of law, we must review the inappropriate damage to lives and properties in the past -- such as mishandled judicial cases, including those related to the 228 Incident, and the assets robbed by the KMT.
By turning its back on authoritarianism, the KMT might have openly embraced the rule of law with the arrival of democracy, carrying out party reforms to transform itself into a real democratic party. Unfortunately, it has not changed its authoritarian attitude. Not only is it holding on to its assets, but it has also resisted various reforms, as if the party is the driving force of Taiwan's "counter-revolution."
It is no wonder that, come election time, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) takes aim at the KMT's assets -- this is campaign ammunition that is ready at hand. In past elections, the KMT has adopted the tactic of shameless denial. To every accusation, the KMT would respond with all sorts of unreasonable nonsense. And so, with each election, the KMT loses a few more votes.
The period after each election is an excellent time for the KMT to engage in self-examination about making thorough internal reforms, but because of succession struggles and the unwillingness of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Over the years, the KMT's assets and bribery have been the two pillars of its electoral machine. It is the party's assets that allow it to buy votes. After many years of engagement with the KMT, the DPP is very aware of the KMT's tricks, and in every election Justice Minister Chen Ding-nan (
Which member of the KMT's localization faction has not joined that party with an eye to its massive resources? It's no wonder that the KMT is holding on to its assets for dear life, for without them, the party would disintegrate. The KMT's current suit against the premier is simply an expression of the dialogue between an authoritarian system and a democratic one. As there is no common ground, there is no choice but to take the matter to court. As for the people, their judgement will be expressed in the le-gislative elections next month.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS