US Secretary of State Colin Powell's recent statements upset Taiwan, for not recognizing it as a sovereign nation, a reaction more to the point than that from Singapore. At least three factors were not expressed publicly in official comments, or at least were not seen in overseas news.
First, Taiwan has not enjoyed human rights, nor freedom of speech, on the international stage for the past 60 years. These are what Taiwan has to insist on. Neither the KMT nor the DPP administrations have openly challenged China, the US and the whole world on these rights of Taiwan's people. These fundamental rights to seek her own happiness, freedom of speech and movement as a world citizen, which includes the right to referendum, self-determination for eventual independence (or joining other nations) and sovereignty. No nation of the civilized world can deny Taiwan that right.
Second, Taiwan did not realize that the US was acting according to its interests, mainly to make North Korea agree to come to the negotiating table. China is probably the only superpower that can do that. Although the Democrats' presidential candidate [Senator John Kerry] suggested there was no need for six-nation negotiations -- which probably originated from Powell -- this direction may be a dead end. National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice traveled to China a few months ago and did not kowtow to Beijing. Powell probably was trying to salvage his credibility by taking this direction. China is playing the Taiwan card as well. As a result, Powell kowtowed to China with his statement on Oct. 28.
Third, Powell's statement was probably directed at China. This is what I think his message to China would have been, in parentheses: Taiwan is not independent (now -- he used the present tense), Taiwan does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, (this is the opportunity China should grab and talk to Taiwan now, when there are strong pro-China factions in Taiwan, because there may be a chance for the reunification which you are looking for). What Powell did not say was that (you, China) may not have any hopes of reunification when Taiwan becomes independent and enjoys sovereignty as a nation.
Moreover, I believe pro-independence factions in Taiwan should thank Powell for bringing this wake-up call to Taiwan. It is not too late for Taiwan to act according to its own interests, with something of a two-handed diplomacy: One plays white-face and the other black-face.
Lastly, Taiwan should always be able to object to any Taiwan-bashing, even from a friend, by insisting on its human rights when facing China's pressure in any meeting.
Rao Kok-Sia
Charlestown, MA
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
Taiwan needs to step up efforts to protect its access to rare earths amid escalating geopolitical risks and global economic uncertainty, given that its export-oriented economy relies heavily on imports of the elements to produce electronics. Taiwan is not the only country facing pressure to secure stable access to rare earths — metallic elements used in artificial intelligence servers, smartphones, electric vehicles and military applications such as fighter jets — after China imposed an export licensing measure last year that threatened to cut off supplies. China is using its dominance in rare earths as a bargaining chip in its trade negotiatons