With great power comes great responsibility. Even Spiderman, a fictional hero, knew this. But Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) does not. He does not seem to realize the great power he wields as the leader of the opposition party, nor the great responsibility this position implies. Even worse, he considers taking the law into his own hands as the right move. We do not need lawyers, judges, courts and laws -- what for? If you do not agree with someone, just kill him or her and take justice into your hands.
What a pity they do not apply this to the KMT's stolen assets: Dear Taiwan, if you believe that we, the KMT, have stolen something in our 50 years of single-party rule, please come and take it, because (and I am paraphrasing Lien) as long as we see anyone who makes fraud or unlawful actions, everyone can put this guy to death. It seems to me KMT officials are going to need a battalion of security guards to stay alive and keep their stolen assets.
Nevertheless, these kinds of ideas and actions sound familiar to me. Too familiar: they remind me of 1947, the 228 Incident and the White Terror that followed. The KMT's understanding of justice, law and fairness was very simple and very dangerous: Those who are not with us are against us, so we have the right to kill them. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) apologized for this brutal and cold-blooded aggression against the Taiwan-ese people, but that apology was apparently just his apology. The KMT seems not to really mind what it did back then, and it is continuing in the same track without realizing that society has changed.
More than 50 years later, and it seems that the KMT has not learned any lessons. Violence and aggression are still the answer for the KMT's foes. Law, for the KMT, means "our will," and truth stands for "our version of the story." If judges agree with the pan-blues, the judges are right -- if not, the judges are wrong. So the pan-blues are above the law: this is the message to all of us who live in Taiwan.
When Spain finished its civil war, and in Germany when World War II ended, there was a common feeling in the population summarized by the words "never again." The pan-blue camp seems not to have learned this lesson, and for them power is so addictive that they would kill -- or even worse, they invite others to kill, so they can grasp power and hold it forever. It is not too different from the political methods of their counterparts on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
Let's hope that a wave of new politicians will soon emerge in the KMT ranks. This country needs a first-rate opposition party so that the much-needed "check and balances" necessary in any true democracy can really be established. Until then, simply brace yourself for the bumpy -- and sometimes hilarious -- road ahead.
Francisco Carin
Taishan
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS