The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently debating whether to include in the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) language that would extend those regulations to "independent health territories" such as Taiwan. If the proposal for such an amendment by Taiwan's allies such as the US, Nicaragua, and Paraguay is accepted, it would be a major step forward in Taiwan's long campaign to join the health organization.
The WHO members adopted the International Sanitary Regulations -- later renamed the IHR -- as early as 1951. The goal of the IHR is to prevent and minimize the spread of communicable diseases across borders, with the initial focus on cholera, yellow fever, smallpox, relapsing fever and typhus. The origin of the IHR can be traced all the way back to the early 1800s, when cholera epidemics swept Europe and led to the first International Sanitary Conference in 1851, one the earliest attempts at multilateral cooperation to control the spread of epidemics. Within the next five decades, several conventions on the spread of infectious disease across borders were negotiated.
The history of the IHR shows the dire need for international cooperation to control epidemics. This need has become even more acute with the rapid increase in international travel. No one country in its right mind can believe that it can slam the door on infectious diseases spreading through its borders from other parts of the world. No one country can shy away from its duty as a member of the globalized world to cooperate with other members in combating epidemics, regardless of where a disease originated. Nor can any country be complacent about the threat posed to its people's health by communicable diseases, when the helping hands of an international cooperative mechanism does not reach its borders.
Unfortunately, Taiwan to this day continues to be shut out of such a cooperative mechanism, despite the fact that it is in other ways a fully-participating member of the international community. The people of Taiwan continue to be deprived of the benefits of the WHO. Any government that allows this to happen to its people should be condemned. Except, of course, this did not happen to Taiwan by choice. Dispute the Taiwan government's earnest and prolonged effort, the malicious obstruction from the Chinese government -- which claims Taiwan is not a sovereign state and merely a Chinese province -- has persuaded the WHO to shut its doors to Taiwan.
Under the circumstances, it is of course not surprising that the amendment proposed by Taiwan's allies has met with strong Chinese objection. China cites as reasons for excluding Taiwan the fact that "territory" is not a legally recognized concept under public international law, that the WHO is an inter-governmental organization and that the IHR is a treaty between countries.
One cannot help but wonder, in a situation where people's health is concerned and lives are at stake, should priority instead be given to political and legal disputes? The truth is that the Chinese government does not effectively govern Taiwan and it cannot represent Taiwan on health-related issues. At the same time, Taiwan remains isolated, with no recourse to the WHO's health "safety net." If this situation is allowed to continue, the people of Taiwan and also people in other countries will be exposed to serious health threats.
It is true that the successful inclusion of the language proposed by Taiwan's allies into the amendments of the IHR will not give Taiwan WHO membership. However, it would give Taiwan critically-needed access to the international health safety net -- and that would be progress.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS