The economies of developing Asia are expected to grow 7 percent this year equaling their performance in 2000, which saw their fastest growth since the Asian financial crisis. Growth has been strong in all subregions, and particularly solid in East and Southeast Asia. Is this pace sustainable?
Three factors drive Asia's growth: exports to industrial countries, growing intraregional trade and, increasingly, consumer demand. Major clouds are forming over each of these drivers.
At the global, regional and domestic levels serious risks are emerging. These risks, which are likely to strengthen over the next two years, pose a clear and present danger to developing Asia's economic dynamism. The era of high GDP growth rates, low interest and inflation rates, and strictly managed exchange rates could be ending.
The first risk lies in key macroeconomic imbalances, in particular, the unresolved budget and current account deficits in the US. The persistence of these deficits could trigger sharp increases in interest rates and a considerable depreciation of the US dollar. Growth in industrial countries would slow significantly, leading to a drop in exports from Asian economies. Interest rates in developing Asia would respond to short-term US interest rates in a sharply positive manner. Rising rates would hurt domestic demand across the region.
Risk of china
The second risk lies in China. In the past two years, China has emerged as a major engine of intraregional trade. Developing Asia's exports to China have soared at an average annual rate of 30 percent. Economies in East and Southeast Asia have been prime beneficiaries. A pronounced slowdown in China would affect countries differently depending on the nature of the slowdown, the characteristics of each trading partner, and its trade relationship with China.
If efforts to halve growth in fixed asset investment result in a slowdown in China's growth rate of 2 percentage points, GDP growth rates in developing Asian economies would fall 0.2-0.5 percentage point. Hong Kong would slow about 1 percentage point.
Pair softer growth in China with a simultaneous slowdown of 2 percentage points in the US and 1 percentage point in Japan, and developing Asian economies, excluding Hong Kong, could see growth drop a significant 0.5 to 1.0 percentage point.
These possible outcomes highlight the need in many developing Asian countries to consider medium-term policies aimed at expanding the role of consumer demand in sustaining growth.
Consumer demand is increasingly important across Asia. Its rising profile has been supported in most countries by expansionary fiscal policies and a low interest rate environment associated with accommodative monetary policies. Some danger signals are emerging. In the past two years, a sharp increase in household debt and a consumer debt crisis in South Korea have eroded consumer confidence significantly. This year, the Bank of Thailand tightened credit card regulations to preclude a South Korea-style crisis.
Consumer demand in developing Asia remains vulnerable to higher interest rates. The continuation of macroeconomic imbalances in the US, the likelihood of much higher US interest rates and the responsiveness of local interest rates in Asia require close attention. Inflationary pressures aggravated by the spike in oil prices have also emerged in the first three quarters of this year and central banks are tightening monetary policy.
Imaginative and bold policy responses will be needed to maintain growth amid a pick-up in inflation, weaker external trade prospects, and the need for some tightening of macroeconomic policies.
At the macro level, action is possible in three areas -- fiscal, monetary, and exchange rate policy. Given the burgeoning fiscal deficits in many Asian countries, expansionary fiscal policy is not feasible. Growing inflationary pressures preclude further accommodation in monetary policy. In many economies, exchange rate policy is ripe for change.
Exchange rates
Policy makers in developing Asia have limited their access to macroeconomic instruments through their decision to limit exchange rate movements within narrow or no bounds. In the context of rapidly growing international reserves, this policy could lead to asset price bubbles, abruptly rising interest rates and sharp macro adjustments.
In addition, the balance sheets of central banks are carrying low-yielding US treasuries and high-yielding domestic debt sold to the public resulting in significant financial and opportunity costs. A sharp depreciation of the US dollar would magnify losses manifold.
Developing Asian governments hold about US$1.5 trillion in international reserves. These need to be put to better use. More flexible exchange rates would insulate the economies of developing Asia from imported cost push inflation from factors like higher oil prices, dampen increases in local interest rates, and contribute to alleviating global macroeconomic imbalances.
Firms in developing Asia should secure their competitiveness through improvements in productivity and innovation, rather than relying on weak currencies.
As clouds gather over Asian economies, policy makers must consider new policy instruments -- including new exchange rate policies -- that would enable Asia to hold its place as the world's most dynamic region.
Ifzal Ali is chief economist at the Manila-based Asian Development Bank.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
RSS