President Chen Shui-bian (
If the ruling and opposition parties can conduct a rational debate on the country's major issues, such an occasion is much to be anticipated. But the premise is that the legislature will abide by the spirit of the Constitution and in a legal, rational and reasonable manner allows the president to make his report.
In his request, the president said he wishes to explain to legislators such vital policies as the nation's efforts to participate in the UN and cross-strait affairs, in accordance with Article 4-3 in the Additional Articles of the Constitution (
Chen's attempt to communicate should be welcomed by society, as it has considerable jurisprudential significance. It will help overcome a lack of communication between the ruling and opposition parties that has persisted since the presidential election. Yet whether this attempt will succeed in achieving an effective political dialogue will depend on the wisdom of both parties.
Taiwan's government is not a presidential system. The Constitution clearly states that the nation's highest administrative body is the Executive Yuan, and the premier leads the ministers in directing the operations of the central government. The country's highest representational body is the Legislative Yuan, whose role is to monitor the executive's administrative performance.
The president's role is to transcend political parties and serve as a mediator between the five branches of government and as the nation's representative in dealings with foreign leaders. Chen's "state-of-the-nation" address cannot be considered a question session, for this would detract from the status of the executive.
If, in order to gain support for this address, the president chooses to interact with legislators during the delivery of this address, he might choose to use a procedure similar to that adopted by former president Lee Teng-hui (
In former times, the president was elected through a vote of the National Assembly, and Article One of the Additional Articles of the Constitution states that "When the National Assembly convenes, it may hear a report on the state of the nation by the president, review national affairs, and offer counsel." Even though in 1996 the president was directly elected, Lee used this article to address the National Assembly. He heard responses from members of the assembly and to show his respect he concluded with a final report.
Provided Chen is invited by the legislature, he can give the report in the same fashion. After reporting, each party's representative legislators -- in proportion to the make-up in the legislature -- can offer suggestions to Chen, and Chen can respond at the end of the session, or at some other time or place.
Before the Constitution is rewritten, the president needs to abide by the law while seeking ways to satisfy the legislators. The legislature should adhere to the spirit of the Constitution by inviting Chen for a dialogue.
By so doing, the administration and legislature can communicate under the same roof and separate the arms procurement deal from electoral calculations. In this way, Chen's state-of-the-nation report can set a great example in constitutional history.
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS