Earlier this month, the media devoted massive coverage to the new policy related to the General English Proficiency Test (GEPT).
According to the China Times, Minister of Education Tu Cheng-sheng (
In another report with a sensational headline -- "Taiwanese students' English ability is poor, lags behind in Asia" -- the newspaper quoted statistics from the Educational Testing Service (ETS) which showed that Taiwan ranked third from the bottom among the Asian countries in terms of the Taiwanese students' average score for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) between July 2001 and June 2002.
All English teachers and parents must have felt very sad when reading this. They must have wondered what exactly has gone wrong with our English education.
But we would like to offer our personal opinion and an explanation of the ETS figures.
We assume that the above numbers provided by the ETS are correct. But we must understand that when making a statistical comparison, we have to follow an important principle: compare only things which are based on certain similar conditions.
If we closely examine the TOEFL scores and rankings of the 15 major Asian countries, we find at least two different conditions in the comparison.
First, some of the countries -- including Singapore, India, the Philippines and Malaysia -- have made English one of their official languages. These countries all came out on top in the test.
Second, the sources of students who took the test were different.
For example, the population of Taiwan is about one-fifty-seventh that of China. But the number of Taiwanese students who took the test (25,443) is in fact higher than the number of Chinese students (22,699). Most of the Chinese students who took the test were likely the country's elite students.
By simply taking a superficial look at the quantitative statistics we may not be able to see the whole truth. Therefore, discussion of student quality is also necessary.
If we really want to understand Taiwanese students' English abilities compared to those of other Asian students, a more suitable evaluation is the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Test -- an internationally standardized English assessment -- as mentioned in a Liberty Times report.
Or perhaps the ETS should also provide the percentages of all test takers' educational levels, not just their TOEFL scores.
Of course, from an educational perspective, we certainly hope that our English education can reach the high standards set by the Ministry of Education to boost the public's English ability. After all, this is the primary goal that Taiwan English instruction must strive for. It is hoped that this article can encourage all our English teachers, as well as those who enthusiastically promote English education here.
Hopefully, Taiwanese students' English ability will come out on top very soon through our collective efforts.
Larry Ting is a professor emeritus at National Kaohsiung Normal University and a consultant to the education ministry 's National English Proficiency Test for All on the Web project. Chuang Yuang-shan is a professor of English at the same university and a member of the ministry's English Education Promotion Committee.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS