I have always had a particular loathing of the one-party state -- especially the Leninist sort, which is totally antithetical to the principals of democratic government. The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) both started life as Leninist-style political parties, and when the KMT retreated to Taiwan in 1949, it continued to follow this political model.
During the run-up to the 2000 presidential election, Chen Shui-bian (
I completely opposed this, and warned the DPP that it was in danger of becoming a Leninist party. No notice was taken of my warnings. But now, after winning a second term, Chen has proposed stepping down as party chairman.
At the third anniversary of the founding of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), Chen departed from his prepared speech and said that he hoped the legislative speaker could be a person who served the whole people, rather than serving a political party. He said he hoped the future speaker would not participate in party affairs and would not be a member of a central standing committee or the central executive committee, or serve as vice chairman or chairman.
If the DPP win a majority in the year-end legislative elections then the Cabinet and legislature will be able to operate more normally. In this situation, if the speaker is able to rise above party politics and serve as an impartial official of the legislature, this will be a great blessing for the nation's people.
What Chen said is fully in accord with the principles of democracy. But for Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) there was criticism hidden between the lines. Wang responded by asking about Chen's own situation, since the president is also the chairman of the DPP.
KMT caucus whip Huang Teh-fu (
I have seldom agreed with these KMT heavyweights. But in this case the criticism they have leveled at Chen is deserved. Only by first stepping down as DPP chairman can Chen with a clear conscience demand that the legislative speaker renounce party office. If the country adopts a presidential system, then the political parties should be reduced to being election machines -- as in the US model -- with the president, speaker and other government officials such as the premier, ministers and even legislators all barred from holding concurrent party office.
Chen must establish a separation of party and state by first stepping down as DPP chairman and becoming a president for the whole people before he can demand that Wang step down from his position as KMT vice-chairman. The same goes for DPP Secretary-General Chang Chun-hsiung (
Whether this model of democratic practice is written into the law, or even incorporated into the Constitution, should be carefully considered. But separation of party and state is crucial to the development of constitutional government.
Chiou Chwei-liang is currently a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS