It is generally agreed that Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 is not one for the intellectually fastidious. This wildly club-swinging production is nonetheless po-litically potent, as anyone could testify who has seen its large and appreciative British cinema audiences.
Moore, whose film became the first documentary to take in more than US$100 million, claimed this week at the Democratic convention in Boston that he was shifting US presidential votes away from the Republicans. It is worth asking what his factual basis for this statement might be. Are any of Moore's facts right? In particular, is his biggest conspiracy theory true?
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
In his let's-join-up-all-the-dots way, this Emile Zola from Flint, Michigan, accuses Bush of a corrupt relationship with the Saudis. He says -- or hints heavily -- that US President George W. Bush had business links with bin Laden family that induced him to allow the lot of them to leave the US on chartered planes in the aftermath of Sept. 11, and, secondly, to allow Osama bin Laden himself to get away later, while Bush hastily diverted the public's attention to irrelevant Iraq.
There is only one source given for this material -- a New York writer called Craig Unger who is interviewed onscreen by Moore about it. Unger has written a book called House of Bush, House of Saud. Few Britons have yet had a chance to read it, because its first UK publishers, Random House, took fright at the prospect of being sued by rich Saudis. A smaller firm, Gibson Square, proved braver and Unger's book is due out this month.
Unger is not in the big league of historians. To quote his book jacket: "He has written about the two George Bushes for the New Yorker, Esquire and Vanity Fair." And his subtitle is downright false: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties. The relationship has not been a secret.
The text is solidly enough researched. It does indeed demonstrate convincingly that Bush had a business buddy called Jim Bath back in Houston in the 1970s, who in turn acted as fixer and front man for a pair of rich young Saudis. One of them was a brother of Osama bin Laden, and the other, years later, donated to Osama's Afghan guerrilla war against Soviet Russia.
The book does go on to show too that some Saudi money went into a struggling oil firm, Harken, in which the young Bush was involved.
And it does show that the bin Ladens and all the other rich Saudis holidaying in the US on Sept. 11 were hustled home in an astonishingly privileged way, probably thanks to the cigar-chomping Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to Washington.
The book also documents two important general points. One is that the undeservedly wealthy Saudis have invested an estimated several hundred billions of US dollars.
The other key fact proven is that the Saudi royals have helped preserve their close link with the US by aiding successive administrations in unsavory plots and plans. These included arming the Nicaraguan contras, covertly arming former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein (in the days when it suited the US to encourage him), and using Saudi conduits to funnel money to Osama bin Laden himself (ditto).
Unlike Moore's film, the underlying Unger book is perfectly fastidious with the facts. But Unger's dots don't join up to make a conspiracy either.
For a start, they do not show that a bin Laden directly funded Bush. For another thing, the bin Ladens are a huge clan, and knowing a single one of them does not automatically tar you with the Osama bin Laden brush.
Most important of all, there is a fundamental misreading of the nature of the relationships at work here. Many Western politicians in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s sought to shake down the Saudis and relieve them of their oil money, either to prop up their local economies or to line their pockets. Britain's own Conservative party Cabinet minister Jonathan Aitken was a case in point, and ended up going to jail as a result.
Naturally, this required the turning of a blind eye to the alarming characteristics of Saudi society -- for example, its brutality, corruption, despotism, misogyny, fanaticism, hypocrisy, dishonesty and greed.
And equally naturally, it is very embarrassing for the likes of Bush when the consequences of that sort of behavior blows back in your face. Who would want to advertise it?
But this does not make a conspiracy. There is no real evidence in Unger's book that Bush wanted Osama bin Laden to escape, or that he invaded Iraq as a deliberate distraction.
In fact, the Sept. 11 commission last month blamed the Defense Department arch-hawk Paul Wolfowitz for Bush's Iraq obsession, quoting the president telling British Prime Minister Tony Blair that Iraq was not the immediate problem, whatever Wolf-owitz said.
Moore's defenders say that, if not factually correct, then his film is in some way "essentially" true. Iraqi babies and US blue-collar soldiers are indeed being blown to bits for no good reason.
The West's unholy relationship with Saudi Arabia and the Saudi royal family's unholy relationship in turn with its barbaric Islamists, did, in a general sense, lead to Sept 11. And Western politicians do seem to want to distract us from those nasty facts.
But this makes Fahrenheit 9/11, in documentary terms at least, a fraud. The film is not journalism. It is an extended piece of stand-up -- a satiric riff by one deeply hostile individual.
This shouldn't discourage people from going to this exhilarating movie. But it means that if you have a respect for accuracy, watching will be a guilty pleasure.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS