The source of all evil in the country today is the Legislative Yuan ("Defense ministry preparing for the worst," July 27, page 3).
Open up today's Web sites and papers and look at all the sickness of the nation. One would think laws would have been introduced to cure many of its ailments, or at least attempt to.
Take, for instance, the mistakes of the representative office in London. Laws should have been made to plug the holes in their procedures and weed out those foreign ministry officials who do not have the nation's best interests at heart.
For military officers, laws should be made to curb their abuses of power and position. With criminals more rampant and desperate than ever, one would think legislators would be busy drafting bills for crime prevention and control.
Last but certainly not least is the country's defensive capability -- not just to fight, but to win. Some suggest the nation would have only two days' supply of ammunition if it came to an all-out confrontation with China. One would think the legislators would feel some urgency to pass the arms purchase bill. Or, if they disagree with that priority, perhaps they could come up with a sensible alternative.
But alas, the legislators can do nothing better than bicker about election matters that are out of their hands, or argue about which way to look at a map of the country.
Voters would be wise to remember this when they go to the polls in December. They shouldn't just cast their ballot for some familiar face or old acquaintance, or vote a certain way because they've been paid to or because that's what they've been told to do. They should look at the voting records of individuals and the party they represent. They must remember they have their nation's fate and the fate of their children in their hands.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS