President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has launched a campaign of reform within the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), part of which involves his standing down from his position as party chairman. This move meets society's expectations regarding the separation between party and state and is therefore commendable.
Yet the way Chen pushes reforms conforms to the manner of strongman leadership, tainting the goodwill offered by this gesture. As this reform campaign does not have a overall blueprint, some suspect that this is yet another "phase" in Chen's political strategy.
The accumulated administrative experiences of democratic countries teaches the lesson of "establishing an administration within 100 days." This refers to the idea that a new government's performance in its first three months will set the tone for its achievements later.
Since Chen won a second term, he is clearly changing his style. In the past month he has vastly reduced his media exposure, instead talking with experts from many fields and soliciting their opinions on reforms. We believe Chen has drawn his blueprint, and that his proposal to step down as party chairman and reorganize the party apparatus are part of a larger strategy.
Chen is hoping to further his role as an unbiased, non-partisan head of state by seeking this separation between his party and the government. As such, he can straddle the strategic high ground and arbitrate in next year's reforms.
Regrettably, right from the outset, he has raised public doubts as to whether he can make his decisions stand. There have been three amendments to his plans in as many days. First he said he would appoint a vice party chairman to take care of party affairs, then he suggested the party's Central Standing Committee could select his successor from three vice chairmen. Yesterday he said the new chairman's position was to be put to the vote.
The president's intentions to democratize and reform his party have been met with anger and distortions, but we hope we are not seeing the lack of direction that plagued the first three months of his first term. If he really intends to make reforms he will have to communicate with clarity to avoid forcing his advisors and administrators to second-guess his decisions.
Former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (
Yet given Chen's political power, whoever takes up the party chairmanship will need his approval. Since there is an overall blueprint, there is no need for Chen to be coy and evasive. Chen has been accused of being inconsistent, contradictory and insincere in his attitudes toward cross-strait relations, referendums and financial reforms. Whether he can shake off this image in his second term and reveal his vision will be a key factor in whether he is able to carry out reforms. In his first term, Chen was trying to ensure a second term, and now his sights are on establishing his historical legacy. Deep thought, creating the right conditions, building consensus and realizing reform is how successful leaders operate. People are waiting for Chen to take firmer steps and a more sincere attitude to achieve his reforms.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS