When Hong Kong residents rallied to commemorate the fifteenth anniversary of the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown, they mourned with a question in mind: Why did 1989's wave of democratization help end communist rule in Russia and across Eastern Europe, when at Tiananmen it heralded a rollback of people's rights that has lasted 15 years since then?
Princeton University professor Yu Ying-shih (
Earlier this year, some Beijing scholars described China's policy framework as "market economy, elite alliance, authoritarian politics," claiming that this framework will remain unchanged for the next 10 years. Such is the autocracy that has emerged in China since 1989. After a visit to southern China, the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) gave the green light to a free-market economy, linking China's bureaucracy to international capital to strengthen the dictatorship's effectiveness.
This link between the bureaucracy and capital allows Deng to create an alliance of elites, buying support from the intellectual elite. By using superpower diplomacy and taking advantages of its role as "factory of the world" and its own huge market, China could force Western countries to make political compromises. In fact, China's authoritarian politics is just another name for one-party rule.
China has tightened its restrictions on news and publications; even references to the anti-rightist movement and the Cultural Revolution became taboo. The regime further enforces its rule using special agents and authoritarian measures to nip all possible unrest in the bud, including the high-tech monitoring of online media. Doubtlessly, the goal of China's "stability above all" is to maintain the existing order.
Under China's severe controls and softer tactics, the limited freedoms of 1989 have evapo-rated. Not only are rallies and demonstrations strictly regulated, but the iconic figures of the Tiananmen incident also disappeared from the contemporary political scene. These figures include Bao Tong (鮑彤) , Yen Chia-chi (嚴家其), Fang Lizhi (方勵之) , Liu Binyan (劉賓雁) and Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), to name a few.
Two countries survive under the tiger's claws: Hong Kong and Taiwan. Although Hong Kong and Taiwan face different situations (Hong Kong's as "one country, two systems" and Taiwan's as "one country on either side of the strait") and their residents have different agendas, the people in Hong Kong and Taiwan share the same memory of the massacre.
As the interactions among Hong Kong, China and Taiwan become more frequent, the freedom and democracy Hong Kong and Taiwan enjoy certainly will impinge on China's one-party rule. China has switched its targets, eyeing Hong Kong and Taiwan with hostility.
Nonetheless, each armed with its own strengths, Hong Kong and Taiwan are able to stand up against China's unification campaigns to different degrees. Taiwan in particular has mature democratic institutions, so China's roar fails to intimidate.
Although Hong Kong is still struggling in the tiger's grip, its 6 million free people will never succumb to slavery. Their hope for democracy is expressed each year in a candlelight vigil that commemorates the Tiananmen tragedy.
Jin Zhong is the editor of Hong Kong-based Open Magazine.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS