New curriculum ideas
I am a lecturer at National Taiwan University (NTU), but I also have had the opportunity to teach toddlers, elementary, high school and college students over the past two years.
Regarding English instruction, it seems a pity that only parents who can afford Ivy-League tuition rates can give their children English instruction from an early age. If the administration desires a bilingual population, English should be a standard part of Taiwan's national curriculum as early as pre-school or kindergarten, and with no bureaucratic obstacles.
By raising a generation of bilingual Taiwanese students, the human resources of Taiwan would be increased a thousandfold. The need for bilingual Chinese and English speakers will only increase exponentially in the future.
It is a myth that children cannot learn both languages simultaneously, and at an age like pre-school they can learn basic conversational English simply through play while they are still blissfully unaware of concerns like competitive academic achievement.
Next I want to address the issue of "In what context should we teach Taiwanese history?" Currently, even NTU students rarely know much about this rich and fascinating subject. They just learn about China, and still memorize dry facts about every Chinese province.
One suggestion for developing a history curriculum is to take Taiwan's demographics into account. History books could still begin with the earliest civilizations and their accomplishments in China, but then move on to a section on Taiwan specifically. Then they could show how immigration developed from Fukien Province, from where a large majority of Taiwanese came.
Contemporary accounts, such as Formosa Under the Dutch and Out of China (Jong He's travels in Taiwan), or Through Formosa (an Englishman's account of Taiwan under the Japanese), could give an interesting and fairly accurate picture of Taiwan. Then of course it would only be fair to have a unit to discuss the Aboriginal groups in Taiwan. Asian and world history can be incorporated through the colonizing influence of the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Japanese and the Chinese.
Lastly, I think the national conference on high school curriculum being held in Taipei is making a mistake by modeling Taiwanese education on that of the West by separating students into arts or science specializations. Education would best serve students' interests by allowing them to specialize in two subjects, one in arts and one in sciences.
In the West we create one-sided citizens specializing in one area, when in fact we all are capable of excelling in a combination of subjects in both areas. For example, a person who cannot fathom chemistry may actually excel in physics.
To limit students to one focus would exclude them from areas of study that would benefit them. Imagine that in a well-rounded education, artists also could master a "scientific" field like computer programming.
By allowing multiple specializations, Taiwan's schools would better prepare students to excel in a variety of areas, and this would give them more qualifications in their chosen field.
This is a critical time for a truly holistic education to be developed in Taiwan.
Trista di Genova
National Taiwan University
Put Ma in the saddle
Ever since election night, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and his running mate, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), declared the election results invalid, I have been waiting to see how Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九) -- whom many believe will be the KMT's future leader -- would react. I am sure many people who voted for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in this election did so because only the DPP offered a way to move the country forward.
Voters should have choices in democratic societies. Though two slates of candidates ran in the recent election, only one offered a way forward, while the other was really facing backward (the KMT's behavior warrants this remark).
I think Ma could show us the KMT party has a future, and this is a great time for him to show us how he can do the right thing for his party and the country now, under pressure.
I am sure Ma hopes to serve the people as president in the future. Yet do we really want someone who acts this way under pressure (especially toward a greater power) when it comes to relations with China? Come on, KMT, show us you can change the outdated ways of your party and offer the people another choice in future elections.
David Pan
Tainan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS