In the aftermath of the terror attacks in Madrid, it seemed that the election of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and his Socialist Party would have its greatest effect in foreign policy -- the possible withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq and the repair of damaged relations with France and Germany. But the realization is dawning that the greatest effects may ultimately be felt in Spain itself.
Zapatero, it seems, thinks that his country should have a sexual and social revolution.
The 43-year-old lawyer wants to legalize some form of gay marriage, rid public schools and medical research of Roman Catholic dogma, create nonpartisan state television and enact laws eradicating sexism in Spanish society.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
These are not just idle campaign promises. In a speech to Socialist leaders on March 26, he said: "The time has come for extreme respect for the sexual opinions of every individual, a time for a secular vision."
His administration, he added, will mark "the beginning of complete equality of the sexes, of the unceasing fight against criminal machismo."
Zapatero wants nothing less than a brave, new Spain, one that he said in the speech will be "modern, cultured, tolerant."
Already modern
At first, this sounds strange. As the world's eighth-largest economy, and growing faster than most others in the EU, Spain is certainly modern. And of all the countries in Europe, Spain is already among the most cultured, tolerant and socially liberal. This is, after all, the country that produced the anything-goes filmmaker Pedro Almodovar.
One of the most enduring features of the post-Franco era has been the celebration and protection of individual choice and freedom of expression, even when it clashes with traditional Catholic doctrine.
That may explain why prostitution (but not pimping) is legal, and the classified ads for the services so explicit in both liberal and conservative newspapers. Or why Barcelona is one of Europe's leaders in the pornography industry, with Private Media Group, a leading adult entertainment company, trading on the NASDAQ. Every year the city plays host to an erotic film festival.
Spain's gay community is vibrant, flamboyant and politically active. Drug use by individuals in the privacy of their homes is tolerated.
Spaniards of all political colorations scoff at the puritan streak in American politics that made the Monica Lewinsky affair such a big deal.
So why the need for radical change?
Most immediately, Zapatero wants to purge the country of the residue of conservatism that marked Aznar's eight-year administration. Although 94 percent of Spaniards are Catholics, a recent survey indicated that only 12 percent of young people between the ages of 13 and 24 go to Mass every week, and most Spaniards favor the strict separation of church and state.
Legal U-turn
Some changes will be easier than others. Last year, Spain passed a highly unpopular law that would make religious instruction a required part of the curriculum in public schools. Under the Zapatero administration, the law will not go into effect.
As for gay marriage, some form of civil union is already in force in most of Spain's 17 autonomous regions, but there is no countrywide protection under the law. Zapatero pledged in a television interview after the election to introduce legislation to put gay unions "on the same footing as marriage," even if he waffled a bit, adding that "Marriage is perhaps not the best word."
It helps that 68 percent of Spaniards favor gay marriage according to a Gallup poll last year (compared with 58 percent in France and 47 percent in Italy). But on the more delicate and contentious issue of adoptions by gay couples, Zapatero has promised only to find "broad consensus."
Abortion is illegal except in cases of rape, a deformed fetus or the endangering of the woman's mental or physical health. Although clinics routinely employ psychologists who attest to the mental fragility of the patients, there were efforts under the Aznar administration to prosecute doctors for flouting the law. The Socialist Party electoral platform includes a proposal to change the abortion law to allow women to terminate their pregnancies in the first 12 weeks for any reason.
On another level, Zapatero wants to spread Spain's wealth around. For example, he has announced the creation of a Ministry of Housing to provide more low and middle income housing for young people and new immigrants.
This undertaking coincides with an economic boom not seen in Spain since the discovery of the Americas, and ridiculously low mortgage rates that have helped produce one of the highest home ownership rates in Europe.
Respect for women
But Zapatero's most sweeping vision in domestic policy by far is to transform the role of women.
Spain is still a country of gender inequality -- in the family, in the workplace and in the public imagination. During his campaign, Zapatero stressed the fact that Spanish women earn 25 percent less than men do for the same work, that Spain has one of the highest female unemployment rates in Europe and that only 10 percent of its business executives are women. He said that each year there are 50,000 reports of spousal abuse and that 500 women died as "victims of gender violence" in the past eight years.
His government, he has said, will make women respected in Spain, guarantee equality between men and women, force men to contribute more to family duties and even "eradicate machismo." Education, he added, is the key to changing attitudes.
But it will not be easy to alter the fact that women in 84 percent of Spanish households always or usually do the laundry, or that in 73 percent of the households they always or usually prepare the next day's meals, according to a 2002 survey by Spain's Center for Sociological Research. And what about help-wanted ads that routinely specify that only attractive women under the age of 35 need apply? Or that divorce laws still favor men?
Asked in an interview in El Pais last month whether the sheer scope of his domestic and foreign policy agenda makes him dizzy, Zapatero replied: "I have the advantage that I usually sleep well." A political cartoon published since his election showed him sitting up in bed next to his wife, Sonsoles Espinosa, reading a book on how to become a leader in three days.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS