The pan-blue post-election effort to reverse the voters' decision has stumbled badly over the issue of the attack on President Chen Shui-bian (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Lee dispatched three experts to visit the crime scene, review the evidence, interview witnesses and check out the Criminal Investigations Bureau and Tainan prosecutors' investigative efforts.
The team did all that and more, even obtaining permission to examine Chen's wound.
Their conclusion: Chen and Lu indeed appear to have been shot on March 19, and at the time that cameras and witnesses suggest they were shot. One of the experts, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Coroner Cyril Wecht -- who was highly critical of the controversial Warren Commission investigation of the 1963 assassination of former US president John Kennedy -- said: "Everything is completely consistent -- no discrepancies, nothing strange." He said that the president's wound "is completely consistent with a gunshot wound," and added that the investigation of the incident was being conducted in a "completely open way -- not the way it was done in 1963 in America."
If that is the case, and given who invited Wecht and his colleagues into this investigation in the first place (a point not mentioned in most media reports), one has to wonder at Lien and Soong's further demands. Why the need for another "independent" investigation of the shootings if the current investigation is being done openly and handled well according to their own experts?
Meanwhile, if the investigation so far suggests that the shooting was a genuine attack on the president and vice president, how on earth can the pan-blue team claim, as they are now doing, that the decision to put the military and police around the country on alert was simply a political scheme to keep soldiers and cops from voting? I would argue that had the government not put the military and police on some kind of higher alert status following the attack, it would have been at best derelict, and at worst, open to the suspicion that somebody knew the shootings were bogus.
I can state with some confidence that if the president and vice president of the US were shot and wounded at the same time, and if the perpetrators were not immediately caught, the US would be on a high state of alert. (Why do people think US Vice President Dick Cheney has spent most of his time since Sept. 11 in hiding?)
Certainly there are questions that should be answered: Who came up with the foolish idea of having Chen and Lu repeatedly appear in public together? And who could have come up with the equally foolish idea of having them ride down crowded streets in an open jeep?
But at this point, continuing to charge that the shootings may have been staged, as the pan-blue leaders are doing, is nothing but dangerous demagoguery.
A recount in such a close election, carefully monitored and openly done under court supervision, makes absolute sense.
As for the rest of the pan-blue demands, charges and insinuations, they should be seen clearly for what they are -- the desperate ploy of people who have lost but won't admit it.
Dave Lindorff is a Fulbright Senior Scholar in residence at National Sun Yat-sen University.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
US President Donald Trump on Monday gave his inauguration speech. Although mainly directed at US citizens, his words were subject to global scrutiny by leaders and others wanting to understand more about his intentions for his second term. The US has been Taiwan’s strongest ally since the end of World War II and Trump’s first term brought many welcome advances in Taiwan-US ties. Still, many Taiwanese are concerned about what Trump’s second term will mean for the nation, especially after comments he made concerning Taiwan’s national defense and semiconductor industry. During Monday’s address, Trump said that the US “will once again consider
RSS