Like its fickle weather, Beijing varies in its judgment on and response to Taiwan's recent presidential election. Before the election, Chinese media acted like the pan-blue camp's cheerleaders. Yet, upon the declaration of the election result, China's Taiwan Affairs Office warned that it would not stand idly by if the violence in Taiwan got out of control.
When countries such as the US and Japan congratulated President Chen Shui-bian (
Two programs in China that routinely report on Taiwan's political development are Across the Taiwan Strait on the Chinese Cultural Television (CCTV) and Taipei on Air on Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV and both gave a lot of air time to the election.
Across the Taiwan Strait is similar in format to Taiwan's political talk shows. Heated discussion among guests is rare. They all share the same enemies -- from former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to Chen. They also hoped for a pan-blue victory -- in the belief that if that were to happen, China and Taiwan would get along better and direct links would be more likely to materialize. Experts and academics invited to the show even offered advice to the pan-blue camp as if they were its campaign chiefs in Beijing.
Phoenix TV is an important channel through which Chinese intellectuals can gain an understanding of Taiwan. Despite its location in Hong Kong, the station seldom touches upon matters in the territory; it tends to focus on the political situation in China and Taiwan.
Although its ideology shares similarities with Beijing's, it sometimes deviates and then suffers from being jammed. It is by no means an open-minded media corporation. Intellectuals like it simply because it provides ample information and the way it presents views on Taiwan is somewhat different from Beijing's official version. Many of its staff are from Taiwan, including anchor Angela Chou (
Phoenix TV has probably offered the most coverage and commentary on the election. Early on, Juan predicted the pan-blue camp would win. His reason was simple -- the pan-greens have never won an election when the pan-blues were united. He obviously overlooked Lee's influence and a rising Taiwanese awareness, which is rewriting the map of national identity.
When the ballot-counting was almost complete on March 20, a Chinese commentator, unhappy to see the pan-blue ticket lagging behind, described the election as a battle between intellectuals of the modern north and localization activists of the underdeveloped south. He contended that Chen, with support from the south, would not be able to link Taiwan with the international community.
This ridiculous and seriously biased point was, however, echoed by a Taiwanese journalist, a pan-blue supporter. Seated with commentators of the "same side," she dull-wittedly offered two more peculiar perspectives. She said that with a higher living standard, pan-blues, unlike the pan-greens, who only focus on localization, have more experience in travelling abroad and interacting with Chinese. She thus believed that they are more likely to support cross-strait talks. The other peculiar reasoning she put forward was that since all her friends were pan-blue supporters, the only explanation for Chen's re-election was vote rigging.
Other than these absurd comments, the station ingeniously downgraded the Presidential Office to "Chen Shui-bian's office" during the March 27 rally.
Among for the print media, Cankaoxiaoxi is worth monitoring, even though it mainly translates wire stories. When China was closed to the outside world, only its leadership had access to the paper. The paper thus became a window to the world for the Chinese leadership; yet, it also followed their views on international affairs. During the election, Cankaoxiaoxi appeared to be a co-effort of the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party. It simply reprinted the stories in the KMT's Central Daily News, from white-collar fugitive Chen Yu-hao's (
A majority of the Chinese media, in fact, cheered for the pan-blue camp. The official Xinhua news agency's subsidiary, Globe magazine, even published a special edition with the picture of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
It is noteworthy that the pessimistic views about Taiwan in big newspapers like the Nanfang Daily are actually submitted under pseudonyms by people working in the Taiwanese media. Is that what the pan-blue camp calls cross-strait exchange?
China's media is likely to unleash even fiercer propaganda attacks on Chen and Taiwan. This will not surprise the Taiwanese. What bewilders and surprises them is the participation of other Taiwanese in these operations.
Hsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer based in Beijing.
Translated by Jennie Shih
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS