One of the first official acts of US President George W. Bush's administration was to downgrade the office of national coordinator for counterterrorism on the National Security Council -- a position held by Richard Clarke. Clarke had served in the Pentagon and State Department under former US presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, and was the first person to hold the counterterrorism job created by former US president Bill Clinton. Under Clinton, he was elevated to Cabinet rank, which gave him a seat at the principals' meeting, the highest decision-making group for national security.
By removing Clarke from the table, Bush put him in a box where he could speak only when spoken to. No longer would his memos go to the president; instead, they had to pass though a chain of command of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy, Stephen Hadley, who bounced each of them back.
Terrorism was a Clinton issue: "soft" and obscure, having something to do with "globalization" and other trends ridiculed from the Republican Party platform.
"In January 2001 the new administration really thought Clinton's recommendation that eliminating al-Qaeda be one of their highest priorities, well, rather odd, like so many of the Clinton administration's actions, from their perspective," Clarke writes in his new book, Against All Enemies.
When Clarke first met Rice and immediately raised the question of dealing with al-Qaeda, she "gave me the impression she had never heard the term before."
The controversy raging around Clarke's book and his testimony before the Sept. 11 commission that Bush ignored warnings about terrorism that might have prevented the attacks revolves around his singularly unimpeachable credibility. In response, Bush has launched an offensive against him, impugning his personal motives, saying he is a disappointed job-hunter, publicity-mad, a political partisan, ignorant, irrelevant -- and a liar.
Clarke's reputation in the Clinton White House was that he could be brusque and passionate, but also calm and single-minded. He was a complete professional, who was a master of the bureaucracy. He didn't suffer fools gladly, stood up to superiors and didn't care whom he alienated. His flaw was his indispensable virtue: He was direct and candid in telling the unvarnished truth.
Counterterrorism
But his account need not stand on his reputation alone. Clarke was not the only national security professional who spanned both the Clinton and Bush administrations. General Donald Kerrick served as deputy national security adviser under Clinton and remained on the National Security Council into the Bush administration. He wrote his replacement, Stephen Hadley, a two-page memo.
"It was classified," Kerrick told me. "I said they needed to pay attention to al-Qaeda and counterterrorism. I said we were going to be struck again. They never once asked me a question, nor did I see them having a serious discussion about it ..."
"I agree with Dick that they saw those problems through an Iraqi prism. But the evidence, the intelligence, wasn't there," he said.
Rice now claims about terrorism that "we were at battle stations." But Bush is quoted by Bob Woodward in Bush At War as saying that before Sept. 11, "I was not on point... I didn't feel that sense of urgency."
Vice President Dick Cheney alleges that Clarke was "out of the loop." But if he was, then the administration was either running a rogue operation or doing nothing, as Clarke testifies.
Bush protests now, "And had my administration had any information that terrorists were going to attack New York City on Sept. 11, we would have acted."
But he had plenty of information. The former deputy attorney general, Jamie Gorelick, the only member of the Sept. 11 commission to read the president's daily brief, revealed in the hearings that the documents "would set your hair on fire" and that the intelligence warnings of al-Qaeda attacks "plateaued at a spike level for months" before Sept. 11. Bush is fighting public release of these briefings, which would show whether he had marked them up and demanded action.
The administration's furious response to Clarke only underscores his book. Rice is vague, forgetful and dissembling. Cheney is belligerent, certain and bluffing. In Clarke's account, as in the memoir of former secretary of the treasury Paul O'Neill, Bush is disengaged, incurious, manipulated by those in the circle around him; he adopts ill-conceived strategies that he has played little or no part in preparing. Bush is the Oz behind the curtain, but unlike the wizard, the special effects are performed by others. Especially on terrorism and Sept.11, his White House is at "battle stations" to prevent the curtain from being pulled open.
Sidney Blumenthal, former senior adviser to president Bill Clinton, is the Washington bureau chief of Salon.com and the author of The Clinton Wars.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS