History has shown that democracy functions best when instituted from within. Our contemporary affairs on the international arena further emphasize this point.
Iraq struggles on a day-to-day basis, failing to secure the delicate balance between freedom, order and equality. In Afghanistan, democratically elected President Hamid Karzai's electoral legitimacy hardly reaches beyond the borders of Kabul, and due to security, his presence merely extends to the fringes of the presidential compound.
I applaud the efforts of the US government to expand
the democratic principles we enjoy as American citizens, but if we are the leader of the free world, democracy construction projects should not be limited to countries that have yet to take the first step toward self-governance.
Though not exactly struggling between freedom and oppression, Taiwan is arrested midway in its democratic development.
The truth is that, as US administrator Paul Bremer stated, that there can be no freedom without security. Security assurance is necessary to assist states in transition. This is especially true for Taiwan, which is in a class of its own, and could use that benefit to attain true democracy.
Taiwan deserves the US' help in defending a true democracy. Unlike Palestine, friction between ethnic groups does not inspire violence
or terrorism, but instead encourages representatives to settle matters in a legislature. Unlike Chechnya, the people of Taiwan have not resorted to
violence to communicate their cause, but believe self-governing principles of the citizens' consent authorize sovereignty. Unlike Kurdish areas in Iraq, Taiwanese society has developed an economic infrastructure that yielded a 2.9-percent GDP growth last year, whereas the US grew at 2.3 percent.
Ironically, the only issue some might be uneasy with is Taiwan's over-emulation of the US' government and political process. The constitutions of both countries are fundamentally identical: A bill of rights protects the citizens and branches of government separate powers to check and balance each other. Some may even find it amusing that the free press in Taiwan, like in the US, provides political candidates with an effective venue
to sling mud and hurl negative ads. Campaigns are also about horserace politics and trivially focus on scandals rather than the issues, a feature Americans are familiar with. Finally, here's the kicker -- the last election, just a week ago, featured disputed ballots where voter intentions were unclear, followed by the losing candidate suing for a recount.
If Taiwan is politically and socially a Massachusetts-sized version of the US with a population of 23 million, what more does the nation need for sovereign affirmation? Answer: security.
Around 500 missiles from the world's largest country are an effective way to inspire voter apathy or constitute a persuasive retort to foreign policy negotiations.
How can election results be legitimate if people vote in fear for their lives rather than for the general welfare of society? Needless to say, until Taiwan's electorate is free to vote its conscience, it will never really taste self-government.
Unlike the Taiwanese government, the US controls the largest military budget in the world and an unparalleled military ready take on any state or non-state organization wishing to scare voters headed for the polls.
If the US government is indeed an advocate of freedom, then our leaders shall not only plant seeds of democracy in the Middle East and central Asia but should also cultivate democracy in Taiwan. Taiwan needs the umbrella of security against Chinese missiles in order to function as a free and open society. There is no need to draft a constitution, rebuild the nation or deal with anti-US sentiment -- just a foreign policy consistent with US values.
History will judge the US harshly if it stands idle while a communist country with the world's largest standing army invades a full-fledged democracy without a realistic chance of defending itself.
Whoever the leader of the US is at the time of such a crisis should look at the situation and see a struggle between freedom and oppression. He or she should not look at China and see only the lucrative opportunities of the world's largest market and a chance to appease investors who contribute to political campaigns.
The US' interests will conflict with China's sooner or later, and it will only be a matter of time before the US$124 billion trade deficit spirals out of control. China's military budget will eventually surpass that of the US -- its moon program was funded entirely by the military.
Presently, the issue of democracy in Taiwan is swept under the rug while business and politicians rush to carve and develop China's markets. Procrastinate as US leaders might, ultimately the US will have to choose between fleeting financial gains for the political present or forgoing trade and promoting US values of democracy.
Regardless of what happens, future generations will hold decision-makers of today accountable for freedom and rights, and for this reason I urge US leaders to uphold the ideals that the US is founded upon.
Mark Du
United States
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS