The dust has settled following the debate about voting and vote-counting procedures for the upcoming referendum and the debate about the referendum questions has formally begun.
The biggest issue now is the great difference in attitudes between political camps. In particular, the declaration by a certain presidential ticket that they intend not to vote in the referendum brought another force into play. It now seems voting has become equated with support for the green presidential ticket and vice versa, regardless of whether one supports or opposes the referendum questions.
The result of the referendum is, in fact, irrelevant to the question of who will win the presidential election. Purely as a result of political manipulation, a "political mobilization" aspect is now attached to a decision to vote, thus diminishing the referendum's significance as a means for the people to express their free will.
This development is, in a way, a reflection of Taiwan's "ideology trap" -- any public issue is easily politicized and one's political stance is used to simplify and smear certain opinions. Regret-tably, those most frequently caught in this trap are scholars and cultural and media workers who see themselves as belonging to society's elite. Slipping away from mainstream public sentiment, they block social advancement.
Take the referendum, for example. While not openly speaking out against it, former members of the Council of Grand Justices and legal and political scholars from the authoritarian era have tried hard to fabricate reasons to support the blue camp's suggestion to refuse to vote, thus proving German sociologist Karl Mannheim's standard definition of ideology: Ideology is a thought model that distorts the truth because the truth does not coincide with individual or group interests.
So how do we determine truth? The 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally produced an unprecedented voluntary turnout. But if so successful a mass movement is denigrated as "populist" by scholars, then they are distorting the truth to suit their own prejudices. Further, if a majority of the people believe the wish for peace and opposition to China's missiles are the issues on which they most want to make their voices heard, then the referendum is probably the most peaceful way of expressing this wish through direct democratic means.
The reaction by the "elite" is, in fact, not surprising. Beginning during the martial law era, this group has constantly looked down on popular free will. Using their monopoly on discourse and media, they have repeatedly forced their own ideology onto the public. Although this was quite effective under the party-state system, the people, transformed into citizens and free people with equal rights, are now leading the elite as Taiwanese democracy is maturing.
By comparison, the old ruling class is incapable of casting off the curse of ideology and, becoming "unfree" and unaware, it seems they are attempting a last effort before their final collapse by intimidating voters into relinquishing their right to participate in the referendum.
As we break down the evil influence of ideology, we understand that all free people should vote in the referendum to collectively exercise further hard-won civic rights and fight together to win freedom from fear, the most legitimate of God-given human rights.
All free people should stand up, calmly and peacefully, and vote in the referendum. It is their individual freedom to decide whether to agree with or oppose the referendum questions, but by deciding not to vote, they are squandering their new-found status as free people and citizens.
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor of sociology at National Chengchi University and chairman of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Perry Svensson
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS