Following the lifting of martial law, the nation's democracy has moved forward by leaps and bounds. From the full-scale election of the legislature to the direct election of the president, provincial governor and city mayors, from the freezing of the provincial government to the abolition of the National Assembly, from the transfer of power in 2000 to the current heated referendum debate, there have always been people who worried that the sky would fall and who therefore tried to apply the brakes.
But while they were looking for the brake pedal, the people swiftly moved on to the next stage.
Looking back at the elections to increase the number of legislators in the legislature ("unconstitutional"), the founding of new political parties under the new-party ban ("illegal") and the alarmist statements made in the book T-day published in 1994 ("war"), we see that any kind of positive or negative statement may be the subject of gradually increasing attention and debate. But through the democratic process, the result is an advancement of the general situation. I guess the referendum will bring the same result.
But are there also some demands that in spite of the democratic process remain in the dark, forgotten. Political maneuvering inevitably requires a representative chain of equivalence relations [A=B=C=D, and so on] in order to bring about popular cohesion, promote a wave of collective activities, and bring legitimacy to the discourse.
"Democracy" and "people" are two of the most important symbols of general representativeness in modern politics, but if the two cannot be included on the actual political battlefield to become part of a chain of equivalence in a meaningful discourse, they will remain empty concepts.
"People" thus must be equated with the Chinese Communist Party and Mao Zedong (
For contemporary Americans, liberal democracy is equated with the US Constitution, the American way of life, US diplomacy and anti-terrorism. The greatest differences of understanding this equation are no more than the question of whether terrorism should be opposed in the manner advocated by US President George W. Bush.
In our chain-of-equivalence conflict, "Taiwan," "Taiwanese people," "Taiwanese sovereignty and independence," "democratic reform" and "referendum" are equated with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), President Chen Shui-bian (
Because there really is some distance between the symbols for Taiwan on the one hand, and the Lien-Soong ticket on the other hand, the pan-blue camp is forced to promote a system of negative equations, such as equating the referendum to war, and the DPP is forced to promote provocation of ethnic groups and so on.
It is worth noticing that "black gold" -- which used to stick to the KMT like glue -- this time around has been pushed to the rear. Maybe it is like Kao Lang (
But doesn't this carry the implication that "black gold" in fact is "white gold," and even a source of nourishment for this kind of liberal democratic government, and that this kind of government is a crucial link in the food chain of modern vested interests?
One important function of the chain-of-equivalence discourse is that it hides this food chain. But people are not stupid, and it is impossible that they will not see the existence of the food chain.
Referendums on the national level -- Taiwan's, for example -- risk reducing the complexity of the chain of equivalence, but by refusing to vote we instead place ourselves in the midst of a reductive polarized opposition, using passive inaction to actively verify and even expand the reduction of the chain of equivalence, thereby covering up reflection over the food chain -- for example, opposition to missile purchases.
The Lafayette frigate-related Yin Ching-feng (
Letting there be conflict over seemingly indisputable options is to dissolve reductive equivalence. The chain of equivalence and the food chain will not disappear. We may not be able to do more than to demystify the former and expose the latter.
Yen Chueh-an is a law professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS