China's murky role as an arms salesman has entered US crosshairs, but defense analysts say Beijing's shift toward a more responsible policy on the spread of weapons of mass destruction will limit any damage. \nThis week, reports emerged in Washington implicating Beijing in Libyan and Pakistani nuclear bomb programs as well as a Saudi missile program. \nBut Beijing's response has been notably muted, highlighting a slow but significant shift to be seen as a responsible and leading member of the international community, matching its burgeoning economic might. \n"China's attitude toward proliferation in the last 15 years has changed remarkably," said Evan Medeiros, a Rand Corp expert on China's arms industry and military. \n"Without a doubt, their views have evolved, and evolved in the direction of international practices." \nAt the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Tuesday, a spokeswoman said a Washington Post report that atomic bomb designs found in Libya originated in China was a source of concern and Beijing was investigating. \nShe also simply declined to comment on a Reuters report that US officials think China is still helping Pakistan with nuclear weapons and missile development and Saudi Arabia with missiles. \nNot long ago, China watchers said they would have expected a bristly denial of any notion of Chinese involvement. \nChina has joined a number of non-proliferation regimes in the past decade. In the past two years alone, it has churned out several sets of new export control rules to check the sales of products that can be used in chemical weapons and materials that can be used in ballistic missiles. \nThe main reason for the shift is a desire to improve China's global standing as its economy integrates more closely with the rest of the world's. \n"They are taking a much more active stance in non-proliferation efforts. Part of it is that they want to become a much bigger player on the international stage," said a Europe-based expert on Chinese military policy. \n"It is in their interests to beef up their non-proliferation credentials." \nStill, the fresh allegations did not surprise experts who have long believed China helped Pakistan to become a nuclear power and may even have given Islamabad detailed weapons designs. \nThe Post's report said the Chinese weapons plans were old and had arrived in Libya via Pakistan. China also was known to have helped with Saudi Arabia's missile program. \nChina has tried to strengthen its non-proliferation regime, in what Medeiros described as "a gradual, grudging, continued converging between China and the US." \nBut constraints remain. \nOne key factor is Beijing's limited ability to track what Chinese companies are exporting. \nChina lacks monitors, said defense expert Li Bin of Tsinghua University in Beijing. \n"I think we need more personnel in the government and in companies and research institutes," he said. \n"If we had more people working on this, we could do it more clearly. If you don't have people to enforce the legal structure, it doesn't matter how good that structure is." \nBeijing's reach is limited in a land the size of China. \n"China has always had a problem in exercising central control over regional authorities in this area as in other areas, and the US has essentially recognized that," said Robert Karniol, Asia-Pacific editor of Jane's defense Weekly. \nJust last year, Washington slapped sanctions on several Chinese companies saying they had exported restricted products. \n"That implicitly recognizes that the Chinese government doesn't bear full responsibility," he said. \nChina's defense industry, long known as a source of cheap, low-quality weapons, has been streamlined in recent years to produce higher-tech arms to serve a leaner, more modern military, and has focused increasingly on producing civilian products. \nSince the fall of the Soviet Union and the first Gulf War, China's arms sales have dropped to around US$300 to US$500 million a year from a peak of about US$1 billtion to US$1.5 billion, some analysts say. \nThe Congressional Research Service said the US ranked first in arms transfer agreements in 2001, making nearly US$12.1 billion worth of sales for 45.8 percent of all deals globally. \nChina has 11 main state-owned conglomerates, including China North Industries Group Corp, which the US sanctioned last year for selling sensitive arms products to Iran. AviChina, the civil unit of another Chinese defense firm, China Aviation Industry Group II, is listed in Hong Kong. \nThe army is involved in weapons design and procurement, but has no stake in the civilian firms that produce the arms and sell them abroad. \nOverlaps persist, with China seeing missile assistance to Pakistan and Iran, for instance, as an important way to retain influence in South Asia and build relations in the oil-rich Middle East, analysts said. \nIt is not inconceivable that Beijing, host of six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear crisis next week, may be indirectly responsible for supplying Pyongyang with its atomic know-how. \nAlso involved may be the father of Pakistan's atomic weapons program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, who confessed recently that he sold nuclear secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. \n"What Chinese policymakers seem to forget is that they may be facilitating secondary proliferation," Medeiros said. \n"The scope of the problem with China has changed and narrowed," he said. "But there is still a problem."
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more