Taiwan is a laughingstock
The referendum that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is proposing is a great way to show other nations the giant strides Taiwan has made as a democracy. What better way is there to show how democratic a country it is than by having a referendum law, allowing the Taiwan-ese people to directly influence the lawmaking process? Now, countries such as the US and the UK can see that Taiwan is truly a democratic country. Or is it?
A referendum is a great way to showcase democracy at work in Taiwan. The course of action which Chen's administration is taking, however, only serves to show the rest of the free world how undemocratic Taiwan really is.
The Referendum Law (
Taiwan, however, is not in a state of emergency. Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) clearly states this in his remark that the "referendum is meant to pre-empt a possible emergency situation, while a state of emergency is declared to deal with an emergency situation."
Furthermore, if the issue of legality is indeed "without doubt" as the administration is claiming, then why is it so reluctant to have the referendum passed on to the Referendum Review Committee?
All they are doing is criticizing their critics for being critical of the referendum and its legality issues. Instead of being caught up in a never-ending, finger-pointing argument, why not just silence all critics and send it to the committee and have it certified?
If it is indeed as foolproof as claimed, then it should pass without any problems.
The answer is simple, because not only is there no need for such a referendum, it is also illegal. Taiwan is not in a state of emergency, and therefore the president does not have the right to initiate a referendum. What was a great opportunity to prove to the world how great a democracy Taiwan has truly become has once again been turned into another reason why Taiwan is the laughingstock of the international community.
Arthur Shih
New Zealand
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS