US President George W. Bush gave his third State of the Union address on Jan. 20 without touching on the Taiwan issue. The purpose of this annual address to the nation is to deliver a report on the condition of the union. Annually, the US president will describe what his government has achieved in the last 12 months and what he expects to accomplish in the year ahead.
Thus, it would be appropriate for the message to focus on US domestic development. Believing that tax cuts will strengthen the US' economic performance, Bush asked Congress to make permanent cuts. Bush's remedy for the national health system's woes was a typically Republican one -- he stressed the importance of "choice." He also took a firm stand on the controversial issue of same-sex marriage, emphasizing that marriage should be deemed as the union of a man and a woman. He also reiterated the importance and the success of the "no child left behind" act and pledged support for community colleges.
As for foreign policy, America's hegemonic role in world politics and the tragic events of Sept. 11 and the ensuing war on terror have further strengthened the US' global role. Of course, the war with Iraq last spring, though victorious for the US, remains a controversial issue. Bush had to defend his decision on this in his address. The only other foreign policy issue he briefly touched on was the nuclear program of North Korea.
Why no mention of Taiwan? Wouldn't China's displeasure at the referendum in Taiwan lead to tension across the Taiwan Strait, forcing the US, according to the Taiwan Security Act, to be militarily involved at a time when its troops and aircraft carriers are needed elsewhere? Isn't Bush worried about a potential flare-up of tension? The "non-issue" can be explained in a number of ways.
One, Bush administration officials believe that the wording of the two ballots for the referendum on March 20 does not change the status quo, something the US has warned against.
Two, if Taiwan or the referendum is mentioned at all, Taiwan's democratic achievements have to be recognized in a positive manner. It would be difficult for Bush to say anything negative about a democracy that, unlike France or Germany, has been a faithful ally of the US in almost all its foreign policy initiatives. Bush's advisors have probably not found a delicate balance between US concern with the referendum and its support for Taiwan.
Three, Bush could have a tacit agreement with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) that the US would continue to put pressure on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to return to the "five noes" he spelled out in his 2000 inaugural address and has received assurance from Beijing that no saber rattling is likely to take place. The US is preoccupied with the campaign against terrorism, postwar Iraq reconstruction and the nuclear program of the trigger-happy North Korea, and it doesn't want to add another thorny issue to its already full foreign policy agenda.
While Taiwan should be pleased that our process of democratic consolidation is not considered controversial enough for the US president to mention it in the State of the Union address, the fact that China's aggressive posturing against Taiwan fails to catch the attention of the US public is a worrying sign, especially for those who want to make Taiwan's plight an international issue.
Maybe we are asking too much; perhaps the anti-terrorism campaign and postwar development in Iraq are unlikely to be upstaged by our defensive referendum. We can expect economy, education and health care to be of vital concerns to the American people. Why is it, however, that gay marriage, a fringe issue in Taiwan at most, can garner greater attention in the US than a potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait?
In addition, if one checks the Web site of the Washington Post to see where the major candidates fighting for the presidential nomination of the Democratic Party stand on foreign policy issues, Taiwan is not there. In short, it is unlikely that Taiwan will be a focus of this year's US presidential election. Maybe our self-centered world view needs to be adjusted.
If there is any solace in the rendering of Taiwan as a non-issue, it is the absence of a usually more prominent issue -- the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Yen Chen-shen is a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) said in an interview with The Economist that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been implementing an “anaconda strategy” to subdue Taiwan since President William Lai (賴清德) assumed office. The Chinese military is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around Taiwan proper, it quoted Tang as saying. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” he said. “They give you extreme pressure, pressure, pressure. They’re trying to exhaust you.” Beijing’s goal is to “force Taiwan to make mistakes,” Tang said, adding that they could be “excuses” for a blockade. The interview reminds me