To state the obvious, military/political occupations and international oversight of a country are never welcome to the people who are being occupied and/or overseen. For a while, they grin and bear it, sometimes recognizing the necessity of the loss of sovereignty that they are enduring. But their tolerance inevitably fades -- and fast.
In Bucharest recently, I was discussing the oversight role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in my country, Albania, with an expert from that body. He was surprised to learn that the number of OSCE employees in Albania is equal to that of the entire staff of the organization's Vienna headquarters. The sheer scale of the OSCE's operations in Albania is not what troubles me. What is troubling is the seeming permanence of its mission. Indeed, who is to decide when the OSCE's mission in Albania is over?
The question is, of course, broader than that of the OSCE in Albania. With UN administrators still holding sway in Kosovo and Bosnia years after their savage wars ended, and with talk of a UN mission to replace the US forces in Iraq, when should an international administration be terminated and oversight of a country returned to its citizens?
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Let there be no mistake: the OSCE played a positive role in stabilizing Albania. Its presence throughout the country in 1997 helped keep Albania united at a time of near civil war. But 1997 is a long time ago, and Albania has changed dramatically. Its democracy is secure, its economy improving.
Yet despite these far-reaching changes, the dynamics of the OSCE's presence have scarcely budged. Indeed, the organization still sticks its nose and fingers into pretty much every aspect of Albanian political life. The problem with such intrusive oversight is that political issues that incite the strongest passions -- such as determining electoral lists -- are suppressed when an international body offers and imposes its own solutions. But suppression won't make these issues go away; it only lets them fester. Albanian problems now demand homemade Albanian compromises.
For most issues, I suspect that Kosovo and Bosnia are experiencing similar side effects due to their occupations. A stultifying form of international oversight that offers only fiat or imposed conciliation paralyzes their domestic political development. Even more than in Albania, opportunities to develop the habits of compromise that make democratic politics workable are denied to the people.
In Albania, instead of developing and strengthening our infant democratic institutions, the OSCE, in its desire to see its policies implemented, often seeks to bypass or override them. This retards the country's political stabilization and democratic consolidation. Indeed, on some issues, shades of the old imperial strategy of "divide and rule" can be seen, with the OSCE pitting one Albanian institution or political party against another.
Of course, the OSCE's presence in Albania does have political backing from large portions of the country's electorate. Until 2000, the government tended more to rely on the organization's advice, but since 2001, it has tried to buttress its position by claiming that it gets along better than ever with the OSCE and its mission. When an Albanian minister tried last year to raise the question of the duration of the OSCE's mission, the opposition leapt to the organization's defense. Nonetheless, there is a creeping perception that the OSCE is becoming too deeply engaged in picking winners and losers in Albanian politics -- a perception underpinned by wider questions of sovereignty.
Is the OSCE's presence retarding the country's independence and economic vitality by creating an image of a protectorate, a country unable to forge international agreements or join powerful international bodies of its own volition? Is it the OSCE's presence, and not Albania's government, that is now keeping the country what it has long been, a hermit kingdom?
I do not attribute any malign or sinister purposes to the OSCE presence in Albania, unless one considers inertia malign. But saying that a body means well and saying that it is actually doing any good are two different things.
Worst of all, the OSCE's bureaucratic nature means that it will never have an incentive to leave because the first duty of a bureaucracy is to perpetuate itself. Of course, an effective OSCE mission, confined to Tirana and comprised of experts that the country still needs, would be useful. But Albania no longer needs the OSCE's staff to be scattered throughout the country to monitor every aspect of its political life.
The reality is that the OSCE has achieved its goals. It is time for it to take a bow and go home to Vienna. That's a lesson other occupying international agencies should keep in mind.
Sotiraq Hroni, a former Albanian diplomat, worked as an advisor to Albania's prime minister during the crisis of 1997 and was for two years an advisor to the nation's president. He founded the Institute for Democracy and Mediation, a non-governmental organization, in Tirana.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic