As usually happens in elections here, a group of "unselfish intellectuals" has come forward to make a political statement. Worried that politicians will pit ethnic groups against one another, these intellectuals have formed the Coalition for Equal Opportunity (族群平等行動聯盟), calling on the nation to "oppose the manipulation and tearing apart of and discrimination against [ethnic groups]."
I admire the intellectuals' spirit, but disagree with their negative ideology. After all, ethnic issues have been repeatedly stir-red up in our elections but our democracy continues to progress. Nor did any bloody incidents occur during the peaceful transition of power from the KMT to the DPP, which was one of the miracles of modern democratic politics.
But behind this miracle lies endless helplessness, sadness and hatred. That is why the ethnic issue always is an election issue. On the surface, opposition to the manipulation and tearing apart of and discrimination against ethnic groups may appear to be solemn and moral, but how can mere opposition achieve the goal of resolving ethnic confrontation?
Perhaps the intellectuals do not understand that in the eyes of those who have been oppressed in the past, their position is another kind of oppression.
Not long ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) said in a speech entitled "I Have A Dream" that "In the past, some people may have experienced unequal ethnic treatment in this land, but Taiwan still has to move towards reconciliation. We cannot have an ethnic group oppress other ethnic groups just because that ethnic group itself was oppressed by another ethnic group during the previous generation."
In response to Lien's words, a White Terror victim said he was persecuted in the past but was unable to ask for redress under the military dictatorship. Now, in the democratic era, he must remain silent in order not to "tear ethnic groups apart." He said the past was painful but that the present is even more so because people do not even have the most basic freedom of expression.
How can there be true ethnic integration in a society lacking freedom of expression?
It is not very difficult to imagine the kind of person who would oppose the tearing apart of ethnic groups. A political party or a politician who in the past has persecuted others might offer a cursory apology and ask victims not to publicize their experiences for the sake of ethnic integration. The Coalition for Equal Opportunity has voiced its opposition out of goodwill but unfortunately they have fallen into the trap of hypocrisy.
Opposition is therefore not what is needed to resolve ethnic conflict. What we need is to honestly and bravely face ethnic conflict. In order to accomplish genuine and long-lasting ethnic integration, we must draw upon all useful opinions and study how this country can withstand tension without being torn apart.
For example, the group of intellectuals should tell us all how a victim of the White Terror, during an election campaign, should go about revealing his or her misfortunes without being said to be pitting ethnic groups against each other. How can others understand this persecution, lend a helping hand and embrace the victims? How should voters go about interpreting malicious rumors instead of being confused by them? How should they implement their civic rights and overcome the media that specialize in pitting ethnic groups against each other?
The intellectuals should not delay answering these questions until after the election because no matter who is elected, politicians will forget the victims and rush to compromise with the media. The media will abandon the intellectuals and continue to encourage division.
Democratic politics is not perfect, nor is credibility, which is only examined at election time. The important issue of ethnic integration has been ignited. We should not let it die out due to hypocrisy. Opposition is inferior to promotion -- the intellectuals should give ethnic integration a different kind of opportunity.
Bob Kuo is a professor in the department of information management at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic