About 500,000 people took to the streets in Hong Kong to protest the legislative process surrounding Article 23 of the Basic Law (
Meanwhile, the outbreak of SARS wreaked havoc in Hong Kong. It was almost like the end of the world at that time, but the TV station covered its eyes.
Guangdong Province exported the disease to Hong Kong and seriously endangered the people of the territory. The media could only keep their mouths shut as officialdom tried to cover up the epidemic.
CCTV suddenly became lively again after the World Health Organization (WHO) pressured the Chinese government, which eventually dismissed its health minister and the mayor of Beijing after Chinese President Hu Jintao (
I recently attended a seminar in Beijing, and was deeply moved by the experiences of outstanding Chinese journalists working to uncover scandals.
Take those idealistic journalists in their thirties at the News Investigation (新聞調查), a famous weekly news program.
They work outside CCTV's personnel structure.
On the one hand, they have to resist huge pressure coming from people with power, money and connections.
On the other hand, they have to endure half their reports ending up in the wastebasket.
Zhang Jie (
He frequently reminds young journalists that they should "remember to represent the interests of the masses."
CCTV takes in half of China's TV commercials. It's a gigantic monopolistic organization with exorbitant profits.
News Investigation and other programs can hardly touch on China's fundamental structural problems. But the public is overjoyed about the program's uncovering instances of minor corruption.
Many journalists have benefited from the marketization of the media. Market interests have kidnapped the passion for political reform, but there are quite a few journalists who are still full of ideals.
They love to stand up against injustice. They long for Western journalistic professionalism, but they use the Chinese Communist Party language -- such as "serving the people" and "the path of the masses" -- to open up gray areas.
More than a decade ago, Chinese intellectuals listened to Voice of America despite the interference of noisy shortwave static.
With the Internet, they do not have to undergo such torment anymore. Today, they turn to the Hong Kong-based Phoenix Satellite Television (鳳凰衛星電視) when a significant event occurs.
However, Phoenix TV not only remained silent about Hong Kong's massive demonstration last year, but also purposely used close-ups to exaggerate left-wing gatherings.
Beijing did not prevent the crowds from marching and Phoenix TV regretted sailing in the wrong direction.
Friends in Beijing's journalism circles described Phoenix TV as the second CCTV.
Some of the commentators gesturing in the programs are just like the "fifth column," fomenting a narrow nationalism that even Chinese people, who are used to this kind of thing, can't take.
Phoenix TV has held back from criticizing China for fear of rocking the boat. The station is bound to go downhill sooner or later.
Lee Chin-chuan is the chairman of the Department of English and Communication at the City University of Hong Kong.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS