This year, after the toppling of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, a rarely heard word -- quietism -- came through loud and clear.
Scott MacLeod of Time magazine led the way in April by referring to Iraq's "Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who favors the traditional `quietist' role of the clergy in politics." Earlier this month, as Sistani pressed his demand for prompt popular elections on the occupying forces, Juan Cole, a University of Michigan history professor, told Jim Lehrer on the PBS NewsHour that Sistani "is from that quietist tradition of Najaf that believes that the clerics ought not to get involved too closely in day-to-day governing affairs."
Is this new ism a whispered style of speaking or is it a religious movement? It depends on whether you capitalize it.
Quietism with a capital Q is a mystical form of religion, first propagated in the Guida Spirituale in 1675 by Miguel de Molinos, a Spanish priest, who enjoined his followers to contemplate passively, with such devotions leading to the beatific annihilation of the will. He was condemned as a heretic by the Inquisition and his doctrine was repudiated.
Though Protestants, and especially Quakers, debated the role of the religious person in political life, Quietism became best known as a characteristic of the religions of Asia, India and the Middle East -- often searching for inner peace and becoming one with God, more than becoming active in doing good works or crusading for social justice.
When the word was used to describe that detached attitude in political life -- analogous to Quietism in religion -- it was decapitalized.
"I will not talk to you about politics," wrote a philosopher in 1798, "because you are among the moderates and quietists."
The lower-cased word recently strode upon the world stage to describe the difference in approach within the Shiite clergy in Iraq. In Iran, ayatollahs are just the opposite of quietist, having taken over the government, but in Iraq, most Shiite clerics -- Sistani in the lead -- are supposedly concerned primarily with Islamic morals and values, not with running the country.
The mode of quietism, not the religious mysticism, has made its way into the language to describe an attitude. Anthony Lewis, on the federal courts in the late 1990s: "`Activism?' `Quietism' would be more like it."
The adjective "quiet," from the Latin for "resting," appears in another Middle Eastern context. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon uses the word to describe his condition (precondition is redundant) for peace negotiations, meaning "a cessation of terror attacks."
To split hairs, the primary meaning of "quiet" is "silent, hushed." Another meaning is "calm, untroubled" and another is "restrained."
Quietude is a state of tranquillity, with quietist moving from "one in a state of passivity" to its developing "low-key activist." There is as yet no "noisyism."
EXCEPTIONALIST TRIUMPHALISM
Two other old isms are new again. When Howard Dean, governor of Vermont in 2000, signed the bill establishing civil unions for homosexuals, he cautioned that "sometimes signing ceremonies take on the trappings of triumphalism," which he thought "not appropriate in this case."
Last month, in a review of Saving Jessica Lynch, the New York Times columnist Frank Rich noted a change in the nation's mood "toward harder-nosed realism and away from unrestrained triumphalism."
Like quietism, the word has its roots in religion. In 1964, Robert McAfee Brown, reviewing Vatican II from a Protestant point of view, was impressed by "its exclusion of the `triumphalism' that has often seemed to characterize the church." The quotation marks suggest an earlier coinage. The word is used today to criticize the attitude of "sore winners" and in politics has replaced an older term, "superpatriotism."
"Exceptionalism" is a related pejoration. (I like "pejoration;" it means "sneer word.") Last month, Daniel Pipes commended US President George W. Bush for the way he had "renounced a long-accepted policy of `Middle East exceptionalism' -- getting along with dictators." The word is applied critically: Ed Quillen in The Denver Post wrote recently of "the widespread belief in `American exceptionalism,' which makes us think that `it can't happen here.'"
American Communists began it all. When Jay Lovestone in 1928 excepted the US from some of capitalism's sins, he was attacked by Earl Browder and Joseph Zack in The Daily Worker for "this `American exceptionalism.'" In Moscow, the word was defined and its proponents reviled: "Exceptionalism holds that American imperialism is relatively exempt from the growing world crisis of capitalism."
In recent times, the pejoration has been directed at those who believe that the American experience places us a cut above others, as if to say "what makes you exceptionalists think we're so special?" It has been used as a synonym for "triumphalist," which obscures a useful distinction: A triumphalist lords his philosophy over the "losers," while an exceptionalist sets his philosophy apart.
Farewell to brie
In the 1960s, politicians trying to identify with the common man -- a locution seldom used because the more inclusive "common person" seems too obviously anti-sexist -- used a tasty phrase to heap scorn on elitists: "the brie-and-Chablis set." The phrase for the opposite audience -- the "reg'lar fellas," average people called in a previous century "the men in the cars" -- was the beer-and-pretzel crowd.
Terminology has evolved (just as change has changed to evolve).
Chris Lehane, once a Clinton press aide and now a senior adviser to the Democratic candidate Wesley Clark (of course there is no such thing as a "junior adviser"), brought the derogation up to date in knocking the followers of Howard Dean. His usage, after he recalled the Park Avenue origins of the front-runner: "Dean has a profile that works with the biscotti-and-latte-sipping crowd but is a much tougher sell for the biscuits-and-gravy crowd."
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
President William Lai’s (賴清德) historic announcement on Wednesday, Nov. 26, of a supplemental defense budget valued in excess of US$40 billion is a testament to the seriousness with which Taiwan is responding to the relentless expansionist ambitions of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Communist Party and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Lai is responding to the threat posed to Taiwan sovereignty along with US President Donald Trump’s insistence that American partners in good standing must take on more responsibility for their own defense. The supplemental defense budget will be broken into three main parts. The first and largest piece