Hypocrisy in Iruan case
I applaud the Supreme Court for upholding the verdict by the Kaohsiung Branch of the Taiwan High Court regarding the return of Iruan Wu to Brazil ("Court orders Iruan returned to grandmother," Nov. 15, page 1).
Although Iruan seems to have adjusted to living here now, he has been the victim of kidnapping and brainwashing. The child's being whisked away to Taiwan against the wishes of his grandmother Rosa, his legal custodian, was a shameless and inexcusable act.
Even worse has been the government's allowing him to be kept here for so long. In light of the number of businessmen from Taiwan (and in some cases their families as well) who have been kidnapped in China, you would think that kidnapping would be strongly condemned by officials here. But some local officials and media have been very hypocritical in expressing sympathy for a lawless child snatcher.
I can fully understand the desire of Iruan's uncle to take care of the child, but callous abduction was not the way to solve the problem.
Let's hope that Iruan is promptly returned to Brazil and that his family there doesn't let his Taiwanese relatives ever see him again. I hope that the uncle has to pay all the grandmother's legal fees as well.
Case closed.
Greg Wagner
Taipei
Real action on human rights
The public doesn't need to be convinced that workers and workers' rights ought to be respected ("GIO draws away from VCD dispute," Nov. 18, page 1). What the public really needs is legislation to protect people's dignity and labor rights, and enforcement of such legislation. The legislature should enact appropriate laws and the government should more vigorously enforce laws that already exist.
Recently we have seen many flagrant violations of workers' rights in Taiwan, ranging from violence against journalists to the trampling of the rights of the individuals who produced the spoof VCDs.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) just received a human rights award in New York, but one has to wonder where to find any actual protection of human rights in Taiwan.
Human rights are not just about releasing political prisoners, and talking about human rights is not enough.
Action is needed to see that human rights are protected, and only the government can take appropriate action.
Political leaders must not wait for a public outcry about human rights. They must take responsibility for human rights and be held accountable for their actions.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
Making freeware an issue
The possibility of Microsoft gobbling up Google ("Keep Google free from Microsoft," Nov 18., page 9) is a very frightening prospect. Bill Gates might be as big a menace as US President George W. Bush.
Amazingly, very few candidates for public office in the US have attacked Microsoft or promoted open-source software.
I made an issue of "freedom-ware" last year when I ran for office in Seattle -- Gates' backyard. The media, predictably, snubbed me.
I'm hoping that in 2004 many candidates across America will make freedomware a campaign issue.
It's about time Gates paid his dues.
I have started a Web site that focuses on freedomware. It's not yet well developed, but you can see where it's headed.
David Blomstrom
United States
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS