The US no longer makes diesel-powered submarines, so its promise to sell eight of the vessels to Taiwan -- offered by US President George W. Bush's government in 2001 -- has now become the thorniest and perhaps the most expensive arms deal in US history. The deal has caused disputes in Taiwan and within the Bush administration. Some US officials have even criticized one another.
The point is: What does Taiwan really want?
If it really must buy the submarines, it should assign manpower and resources to clarify the nation's military priorities rather than dancing to the tunes of different US departments or officials.
Taiwan needs to form a special team for the purchase, instead of solely depending on the US Navy. If it wants to negotiate the price, it should do its homework first.
In fact, US officials revealed that General Dynamics -- which is seeking to win the submarine contract -- has come up with a budget much lower than that of the US Navy International Programs Office (NIPO). But it is unwilling to pressure the navy by way of the Congress or the media because it fears losing it as a client.
As for Northrop Grumman, it has not found any foreign partners and can only re-open costly conventional-submarine production lines in the US. That's why the company supports the expensive US$11.7 billion (almost NT$400 billion) purchase plan proposed by the US Navy.
It is possible to negotiate a reasonable price with the US companies. Taiwan's leaders must take responsibility for making a decision. US officials are highly concerned about the rumor that the US has intentionally raised the price to kill the deal. Some of them have said that Taiwan has tried hard for years to buy US submarines during the annual Taiwan-US arms talks.
The US and Taiwan had discussed submarines for three years before the deal. The US began studying the possibility in 1999, and decided in 2000 that Washington should sell the diesel-powered submarines to Taipei.
After Bush came to power, the US authorities immediately briefed decision-makers on the matter. Later, the Bush administration officially announced its plan to sell submarines to Taiwan in 2001.
Today, some Taiwanese politicians have criticized Washington for forcing Taipei to buy submarines.
Such criticism is unfair to our US friends who helped Taiwan with their political and economic resources.
Another point that needs clarification is whether the purchase needs to be tied to the rescue of Taiwan's state-run China Shipbuilding. Is there no other way for the government to save the company? Not only can the submarines function in anti-submarine warfare, but they can also serve the function of strategic deterrence.
Taiwan should not confuse its priorities by sacrificing this important deal just because the US does not allow China Shipbuilding to build the submarines.
According to Fu S. Mei (
The highly changeable international community is giving Taiwan a second chance now. Can Taiwan understand its own national interests?
Nadia Tsao is a US correspondent for the Liberty Times.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Rather than a “diplomatic win,” the recently announced opening of a Taiwan office in Guyana proved to be a source of disappointment and displeasure. The government in Georgetown decided to halt the mutual establishment of representative offices less than 24 hours after the agreement was announced. Unsurprisingly, the “China factor” appears to have been the primary reason behind this reversal. The Guyanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs explicitly stated that the country would “continue to adhere to the one China policy” as it nixed the agreement with Taipei. Why does Guyana matter, though? International attention on this Caribbean nation of less than 1
The rise of China as a major economy and military power has been a major development this century. While China’s economic clout is felt across the world, it has also been aggressively pursuing a military modernization program. One study published by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies in May last year said that since 2016, China’s annual defense budget has been 7.2 to 8.1 percent of total government spending. Although China has projected its rise as peaceful, the truth is that Beijing has begun to redefine the power structure in Asia in its favor, leading some international relations
The Olympic Charter in the sixth Fundamental Principles of Olympism prohibits discrimination based on nationality or political opinion. It also requires that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) maintain political neutrality and take action against any form of discrimination affecting the Olympic movement (rules 2.5, 2.6 and 16.1.3). The Japanese Olympic Committeeis required to ensure the observance of the charter and take action against discrimination carried out within Japan (Rule 27.2). The committees are failing to carry out their missions. Athletes from Taiwan are discriminated against on the basis of their nationality, and it must stop. Every country that participates in the
With a new US president in the White House, Beijing might have to rethink its approach toward Taiwan following a public meeting on Feb. 10 between Representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and a US Department of State official. Prior to his inauguration on Jan. 20, there was little known about what then-US president-elect Joe Biden’s China policy would be, and there were reports that Beijing had hoped to influence members of the incoming administration over Taiwan and other areas of contention. A BBC report on Dec. 3 last year cited a US intelligence official as saying that China
RSS