Just as familiarity breeds contempt, success often spawns complacency. Sadly, that seems to be the case in Russia, where the government has chosen the first period of prolonged economic growth since communism's fall -- with the budget in surplus and capital flight seemingly reversed -- to re-open the oligarch wars of the 1990s.
Optimists beware: the arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky -- and the freezing of his shares in oil giant Yukos -- will have a profound long-term impact on Russia's economy and on relations between business and government. The Yukos imbroglio will not bring Russia's economy to a screeching halt, because no single company determines the country's fate. But long-term prospects are certain to deteriorate.
The problem is one of trust between the business community and the government, which in recent years had just begun to develop. To put it bluntly, violating that fledgling trust will break the back of Russia's economic upswing.
"Operation Clean Hands" -- what some are calling the investigations into Khodorkovsky and his associates -- will not increase tax revenue, but only spur growth in the informal economy, as businessmen try to conceal their affairs even more completely from the government. After all, once Russia's richest man can be stripped of his assets at any moment, ordinary Russian businessmen may be forgiven for concluding that operating in the open is risky.
The first signs of this realization will probably take the form of an increase in capital flight. Until the Yukos affair, capital flight was reversing. After a decade of hemorrhaging capital, the first half of this year saw data indicating that Russians who had taken their money out of the country were bringing it back to invest at home. If capital flight resumes, it will quickly snowball if President Vladimir Putin fails to convince people that the Yukos affair is an isolated case.
I believe that capital flight will increase substantially. Reduced business activity, with long-term investment projects being cancelled, seems just as certain. A lower rate of economic growth thus seems inevitable.
Nor am I alone. Independent Russian economic experts are unanimous in sharing this grim conclusion. Only people linked to the regime appear to differ.
If investment stalls, Putin will have no hope of doubling the size of the economy within a decade, as he has promised. My longstanding skepticism about this promise has now hardened into certainty: the Yukos affair will make it impossible to sustain the growth rate required to achieve this goal because the arrest of Khodorkovsky and the seizure of his assets has dealt a devastating blow to business confidence.
Indeed, times have changed dramatically since the cutthroat Russian capitalism of the 1990s -- supposedly a world in which entrepreneurs were indifferent, at best, to each other's problems. That caricature, if ever true, is certainly not true today -- the business community's negative reaction to the persecution of Khodorkovsky by the law enforcement agencies has been strong and nearly unanimous.
The growing calls of some state officials to deal with economic crime are viewed by the business community as both a mockery of the legal code and a veiled threat that the prosecutors want their cut of Russia's riches. The improved image of Russia's legal system is in tatters.
Today, the business community understands that the Prosecutor General's Office can find any pretext to go after any one of them. If prosecutors can treat huge businesses so roughly, what hope is there for medium and small businesses? No surprise, then, that owners of companies of all sizes are now forming a united front to protect their interests.
President Putin, meanwhile, steadfastly refuses to discuss the Yukos affair or the actions of the law enforcement agencies with Russia's business community. His silence clearly implies consent to the actions of the prosecutors.
But if the president will not publicly account for the fidelity of Russia's law enforcement agencies to law, who will? One of the great flaws of Putin's presidency has been to allow law enforcement agencies to evaluate their own actions. Of course, they invariably conclude that their actions were right and lawful.
So the president's position is clear and he will not back down. In fact, only businesspeople may now be able to influence events: a sharp and pronounced slowdown, with Russian capital showing its displeasure by voting with its feet, might be the last hope for turning the prosecutors from their chosen course.
But I see no reason for optimism. On the contrary, the arrest of Khodorkovsky has only whetted the prosecutors' appetite. Once they have digested Yukos, they will look for another meal. After that, can anyone seriously doubt that the craving for fresh prey will intensify?
Yevgeny Yasin, a former Russian minister for the economy under then president Boris Yeltsin, is research director at the Supreme School of Economics in Moscow. Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS