Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Why has the time arrived? First, Lee believes that Beijing will not dare challenge the US' military might at present. Second, since Beijing is the host of the 2008 Olympics, it will not cause any mischief before that time.
The first hypothesis is based on the judgment that the US has strengthened its unilateralism after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But it is still unknown whether US foreign policy will change after the US presidential election next year.
The second hypothesis assumes that Chinese leaders and people attach more importance to the Olympic Games than the Taiwan issue. This hypothesis also requires more analysis. Of course, Chinese nationalists will refute such a claim.
To what extent are the Olympics actually related to China's economic interests and international image? What is the relationship between these problems and China's future development strategies? A more thorough analysis is required before a conclusion can be reached.
Also seeing the Olympics in Beijing as a watershed, Japanese academic Kenichi Ohmae offers a different view on Taiwan-China relations. He says that the best opportunity to unify under a federal system will be some time prior to the Olympics.
In addition to the trend of China-centered economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region, Ohmae's argument also takes into consideration the thesis that former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
One Olympics, but there are two interpretations.
These interpretations involve not only objective factual analyses, but also incorporate the values and strategies of these "prophets." Since Lee hopes to lead the people of Taiwan toward independence, he certainly focuses on the question of what time would be the most advantageous to do so.
Ohmae has long advocated cross-national economic integration in the hope of easing a standoff between sovereign states and increasing economic interaction between regions. He not only advocates that Taiwan and China establish a federation but also encourages Japan to actively interact with the
members of this federation. From a short- to medium-term point of view, the year 2008 indeed offers a good opportunity.
Whose prediction is correct? This involves changes in real-life situations and the ability of the players to implement what they advocate. A more interesting question is: Will the world be at peace after 2008? If Taiwan declares independence and Bei-jing does not use force before the Olympics, Taiwan still has to face the pressure Beijing applies at international occasions and the possibility that China might launch a war after the Olympics.
If unification occurs within the next two or three years, how should the various political, economic and social systems of Taiwan and China be combined? Won't such interaction lead to still greater conflict?
Policy implementation must not be halted because of concern about difficulties that may result. Advocates must make more rational statements about the processes involved. They should also foresee problems they might encounter in succeeding stages after attaining the initial goal, and come up with methods for dealing with any problems. Only then can they persuade people to join forces and implement their plans.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Jackie Lin
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
RSS