Anyone who believes French President Jacques Chirac has given up his campaign against what he fears will become American domination of the planet should think again. \nThe French leader has appeared isolated in recent weeks as Washington left him out of kiss-and-make-up sessions with other opponents of the Iraq war, such as German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin. \nAnd Chirac has chosen to avoid another all-out clash in the UN Security Council by promising that France will not use its veto to block US proposals on rebuilding Iraq. \nBut events since the war have convinced Chirac that he was right to stand up to the US and that France's hand has been strengthened for any future tussles, analysts say. \n"The whole episode has been bruising, but not isolating. In fact, France has been proved right," said Francois Heisbourg, head of the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research. \nWhile it is careful not to gloat, France feels vindicated by a failure to find the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq whose alleged existence provided the main argument for war. \nIt also correctly predicted the US could win the war alone but would need others to secure the peace. \n"Multilateralism has been strengthened because the undoubted superpower has been proven incapable of managing events post-war in a country of 26 million inhabitants," said Pascale Boniface of France's Institute of Strategic and International Relations. \nShift in rhetoric? \nFrance was back in action at the UN last week, telling Washington its latest draft resolution on Iraq did not fully answer its call for a rapid handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis and for the UN to oversee a gradual transfer of power. \nIn rare defiance of the Bush administration, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lined up with France in criticizing the draft while Russia, Germany and China all expressed doubts. \nThis time, Chirac hopes Bush will agree US interests are best served in Iraq by working within the UN. \nBut France has no guarantee that the US will not go it alone again -- for example, over other countries Bush has called "axis of evil" states like Iran or North Korea. \nAnalysts say Chirac is shifting his rhetoric to use language less antagonistic to Washington and more likely to unite EU partners split into two camps over the Iraq war. \nIn his speech to the UN General Assembly last month, Chirac avoided any mention of his earlier calls for a "multipolar world" in which the US would be just one of several "poles" of power and influence in the world. \n"He's realized it goes down very badly, both among the Brits and other European partners," said Charles Grant of London's Center for European Reform, noting it smacks of anti-Americanism despite Chirac's vehement assurances to the contrary. \nBy dropping talk of a multipolar world, it is argued, Chirac is making it easier for France and other EU partners to boost common defense efforts without raising suspicions that the EU wants to set up in competition with Washington. \nThat strategy may already be working. Diplomats say even Britain has now agreed that the EU should have a military planning structure separate from NATO. \nNo one believes the EU can rival the US as a military power any time soon. But Grant said if Washington took the EU seriously as a military force, Chirac's dream of an equal partnership across the Atlantic might come closer to reality. \n"Then Europe would be sufficiently influential so that the US would have to take its views into account when making decisions," he said.
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his