Anyone who believes French President Jacques Chirac has given up his campaign against what he fears will become American domination of the planet should think again. \nThe French leader has appeared isolated in recent weeks as Washington left him out of kiss-and-make-up sessions with other opponents of the Iraq war, such as German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin. \nAnd Chirac has chosen to avoid another all-out clash in the UN Security Council by promising that France will not use its veto to block US proposals on rebuilding Iraq. \nBut events since the war have convinced Chirac that he was right to stand up to the US and that France's hand has been strengthened for any future tussles, analysts say. \n"The whole episode has been bruising, but not isolating. In fact, France has been proved right," said Francois Heisbourg, head of the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research. \nWhile it is careful not to gloat, France feels vindicated by a failure to find the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq whose alleged existence provided the main argument for war. \nIt also correctly predicted the US could win the war alone but would need others to secure the peace. \n"Multilateralism has been strengthened because the undoubted superpower has been proven incapable of managing events post-war in a country of 26 million inhabitants," said Pascale Boniface of France's Institute of Strategic and International Relations. \nShift in rhetoric? \nFrance was back in action at the UN last week, telling Washington its latest draft resolution on Iraq did not fully answer its call for a rapid handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis and for the UN to oversee a gradual transfer of power. \nIn rare defiance of the Bush administration, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lined up with France in criticizing the draft while Russia, Germany and China all expressed doubts. \nThis time, Chirac hopes Bush will agree US interests are best served in Iraq by working within the UN. \nBut France has no guarantee that the US will not go it alone again -- for example, over other countries Bush has called "axis of evil" states like Iran or North Korea. \nAnalysts say Chirac is shifting his rhetoric to use language less antagonistic to Washington and more likely to unite EU partners split into two camps over the Iraq war. \nIn his speech to the UN General Assembly last month, Chirac avoided any mention of his earlier calls for a "multipolar world" in which the US would be just one of several "poles" of power and influence in the world. \n"He's realized it goes down very badly, both among the Brits and other European partners," said Charles Grant of London's Center for European Reform, noting it smacks of anti-Americanism despite Chirac's vehement assurances to the contrary. \nBy dropping talk of a multipolar world, it is argued, Chirac is making it easier for France and other EU partners to boost common defense efforts without raising suspicions that the EU wants to set up in competition with Washington. \nThat strategy may already be working. Diplomats say even Britain has now agreed that the EU should have a military planning structure separate from NATO. \nNo one believes the EU can rival the US as a military power any time soon. But Grant said if Washington took the EU seriously as a military force, Chirac's dream of an equal partnership across the Atlantic might come closer to reality. \n"Then Europe would be sufficiently influential so that the US would have to take its views into account when making decisions," he said.
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), tasked with reforming the party and returning it to the viable political force that it once was, is faced with a Gordian knot. The complexities of the job ahead go beyond appealing to a younger generation of voters. Chiang might have to decide between jettisoning much of what the party originally stood for and preparing it for a return to the Presidential Office, or doubling down on its founding purpose and representing what is increasingly, in the current state of Taiwanese politics, a minority view. The KMT, as the founding party and self-proclaimed champion
Although concerned over the impact of many citizens returning from Europe and the US while those nations cope with soaring COVID-19 infection rates, Taiwan has handled the pandemic with alacrity and seems to be successfully managing the process compared with many others, including European nations and the US. Despite its proximity to China, by March 3, Taiwan had only 42 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and one death, while Japan had 287 cases and six deaths and South Korea had 4,812 cases and 28 deaths. This is of considerable interest internationally because Taiwan is not only located near China, but is relatively densely