Anyone who believes French President Jacques Chirac has given up his campaign against what he fears will become American domination of the planet should think again.
The French leader has appeared isolated in recent weeks as Washington left him out of kiss-and-make-up sessions with other opponents of the Iraq war, such as German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And Chirac has chosen to avoid another all-out clash in the UN Security Council by promising that France will not use its veto to block US proposals on rebuilding Iraq.
But events since the war have convinced Chirac that he was right to stand up to the US and that France's hand has been strengthened for any future tussles, analysts say.
"The whole episode has been bruising, but not isolating. In fact, France has been proved right," said Francois Heisbourg, head of the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research.
While it is careful not to gloat, France feels vindicated by a failure to find the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq whose alleged existence provided the main argument for war.
It also correctly predicted the US could win the war alone but would need others to secure the peace.
"Multilateralism has been strengthened because the undoubted superpower has been proven incapable of managing events post-war in a country of 26 million inhabitants," said Pascale Boniface of France's Institute of Strategic and International Relations.
Shift in rhetoric?
France was back in action at the UN last week, telling Washington its latest draft resolution on Iraq did not fully answer its call for a rapid handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis and for the UN to oversee a gradual transfer of power.
In rare defiance of the Bush administration, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lined up with France in criticizing the draft while Russia, Germany and China all expressed doubts.
This time, Chirac hopes Bush will agree US interests are best served in Iraq by working within the UN.
But France has no guarantee that the US will not go it alone again -- for example, over other countries Bush has called "axis of evil" states like Iran or North Korea.
Analysts say Chirac is shifting his rhetoric to use language less antagonistic to Washington and more likely to unite EU partners split into two camps over the Iraq war.
In his speech to the UN General Assembly last month, Chirac avoided any mention of his earlier calls for a "multipolar world" in which the US would be just one of several "poles" of power and influence in the world.
"He's realized it goes down very badly, both among the Brits and other European partners," said Charles Grant of London's Center for European Reform, noting it smacks of anti-Americanism despite Chirac's vehement assurances to the contrary.
By dropping talk of a multipolar world, it is argued, Chirac is making it easier for France and other EU partners to boost common defense efforts without raising suspicions that the EU wants to set up in competition with Washington.
That strategy may already be working. Diplomats say even Britain has now agreed that the EU should have a military planning structure separate from NATO.
No one believes the EU can rival the US as a military power any time soon. But Grant said if Washington took the EU seriously as a military force, Chirac's dream of an equal partnership across the Atlantic might come closer to reality.
"Then Europe would be sufficiently influential so that the US would have to take its views into account when making decisions," he said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS