The US draft resolution on Iraq is considered unworkable by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, especially as it calls for more UN personnel in a country with deteriorating security, a senior UN official said last week.
The official, who briefed reporters on Annan's position on Iraq, said there are "honest differences of opinion" between the UN leader, who must carry out resolutions, and the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), the US occupation forces in Iraq led by Paul Bremer.
The UN official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Annan is not leading the charge against the US draft or haggling to buy a carpet in Iraq.
Annan said last Thursday after the draft was submitted that it was "not in the direction I had recommended."
It was the first time that Annan spoke publicly against a draft resolution.
The official said the UN is not pretending that it can play an effective political role in Iraq under the present circumstances.
"Either the CPA or the UN can be in charge of the process," he said. "Attempting to blur the roles of the two is a recipe for confusion, and that could expose the UN to risk that is not justified by the substances of the draft."
He said recent attacks against the UN compound in Baghdad were evidence of the risk international workers face. On Aug. 19, a massive bomb attack killed 22 UN workers, including Sergio Vieira de Mello, the special envoy for Iraq.
The official said Annan preferred to be given an explicit political role at a later stage, and that role should be supported by the Iraqi Governing Council, a united UN Security Council, the Iraqi people and institutions like the World Bank and IMF.
The official cited the major differences between Annan and the US draft resolution as follow:
Annan proposes that an Iraqi provisional government be set up in four to five months and that the US ends formally the occupation in order to send a strong signal to the Iraqis and the world to cooperate with that government.
The 25-member Iraqi Governing Council was hand-picked by the US with no executive responsibilities.
The provisional government in Baghdad can invite the CPA to remain in Iraq to give the US a legitimate presence. Other countries can contribute military personnel to a UN-authorized multinational force.
The official said drafting the constitution could take up to two years, taking into account the divisions among Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis, all of whom want to share power in a future government.
He said a legislative body, comprising of the Governing Council, the current government Cabinet and the constitution committee, should draft the constitution.
Annan's position is in reverse of the US draft, the official said.
The US has called on the Governing Council and Iraqi leaders to draft the constitution and organize general elections for a representative government. US Secretary of State Colin Powell has suggested a six-month deadline to draft the constitution, which would be submitted to a referendum. No timetable has been specified for the US to end the occupation.
The UN official said it would take years to change a society like Iraq to go from a one-party system under former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to a multi-party system.
He said some Iraqi leaders have suggested using the 1958 Iraqi Constitution for the short term while negotiations on a future constitution are conducted.
"If you allow more time for a normal process to develop, then there is a hope that alliances could develop across confessional line," he said, pointing to Iraqis' thinking that they should not only be identified by their religions or political affiliations, but as Iraqis as well.
The official said the UN is looking for a mandate in Iraq that is "coherent, and not like a higgledy-piggledy consensus for the sake of agreement. The consensus is not enough, the consensus should be on the basis of a coherent mandate."
"What we are looking for is a mandate that is implementable and the secretary-general is signalling that he does not want to be saddled with a mandate that is unimplementable," the official said.
Annan, who has become more aggressive since Aug. 19 to protect UN personnel, wasn't the only one who opposed the US draft.
UN Security Council members like Germany, France and Syria have spoken against the draft as lacking the political and security elements that are essential for resolving the war situation in Iraq.
Syrian Ambassador Faysal Mekdal said the US draft failed to include ideas presented by council members two weeks ago when the initial draft was presented. Mekdal said reaction to the revised draft had been "negative."
Mekdal said the draft failed to include a major demand, which is a timetable for ending the "foreign occupation" of Iraq and return sovereignty to the Iraqi people.
US Ambassador John Negroponte, who presides the council in October, said Friday in reaction to Annan's objections that negotiations are still underway about the draft.
"We will have to see how capitals and delegations react to what has been circulated, and I guess you'll have to stay tuned," Negroponte said.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS