The unsuccessful military coup that occurred in the Philippines in July has once again highlighted the difficulty of consolidating democratization. Many countries have become democratized in the last half of the 20th century, but there are also new democratized countries, particularly in South America, Africa and Asia, where military coups have happened repeatedly and authoritarian regimes have been restored.
In Asia, military coups and authoritarianism still cast a shadow over some countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Myanmar and Pakistan, making their political situations unstable.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) came to power after the death of late president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) in 1988. When former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村), who has an impressive military background, was relieved from office in 1993, Lee said that "it is most dangerous when the snow thaws" and that Taiwan could have a military coup at any moment. The electoral victory of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in 2000 ended 50 years of one-party rule by the KMT. In a culture of long-term "political correctness" that stressed the party, country and military as one entity, Chen sensed a possible perilous situation that could trigger a military coup, and therefore took a series of actions to please military leaders.
With regard to the recent military mutiny in the Philippines, people find it comforting to hear the pan-blue camp, scholars and experts all agree that it is impossible, at this time, for the same thing to happen in Taiwan. This is despite the political situation in Taiwan still being unstable due to serious contention between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, and although the nationalization of the armed forces has not been fully completed.
I agree with this view, but the crisis of Taiwan's recognition as a country still has not been eliminated, unfortunately. The restoration of authoritarianism through a military coup may have become a thing of the past, but the shadow of the restoration of the KMT government still lingers on.
This shadow will become more apparent in next year's presidential election, when Taiwan could possibly return to the danger zone of becoming a subjugated country once again. It is not a sensationalistic point of view but a reality.
First, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Second, the stated objective of a Lien-Soong ticket is to return to the era of Chiang. Before his father passed away, Chiang presided over the White Terror with his hands covered in blood. After his father died, Chiang grasped control of the party, government and armed forces. Although he later advocated economic and political reforms to go with the trend of the time, the White Terror still persisted and the Kaohsiung Incident took place in 1979.
Until his death, Chiang was an authoritarian leader, a "soft authoritarian" figure as described by a professor from Columbia University. It would be a restoration of authoritarianism if Lien and Soong want Taiwanese people to rebel against Lee and return to the Chiang era.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at the Graduate Institute of Southeast Asia Studies, Tamkang University.
Translated by Grace Shaw
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS