As the next presidential election draws near, the cross-strait relationship has become a central issue for both the ruling and opposition parties. President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) first outlined a three-phase scenario to realize direct links by the end of next year. The strategy is aimed at convincing voters that China will make room for reconciliation once he is re-elected and allow for progress on direct air links.
To counter criticism of its ambiguous position on cross-strait relations, the blue camp is reportedly attempting to rationalize its "one China, with each side making its own interpretation" (
Conventional wisdom holds that foreign policy doesn't matter in domestic elections. Unless there is a war or some threat from abroad, pundits maintain that voters don't care about what's happening overseas. But this argument overlooks the key role that foreign policy plays in earning politicians brownie points, especially as foreign policy in Taiwan is always intertwined with cross-strait policy.
While the blue camp and some business groups have been pressuring the DPP for an early opening of direct links, the government took the initiative by presenting concrete steps to implement such links.
Although this has been portrayed as an election ploy, the ruling DPP has at least provided voters with a clear vision and timetable for cross-strait economic and trade normalization. However, the extent to which the plan would work lies largely in whether China would accept Chen's plan and resume dialogue.
For the KMT and the PFP, the "one China" myth has become an Achilles' heel since Beijing sabotaged Taiwan's bid for observer status at the World Health Organization. To avoid being labeled China's "comrade," the blue camp has to defuse the impact of the "one China" principle on its own campaign and skillfully de-link itself from Beijing. That explains why both KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) have been silent on the unification issue.
Beijing's response will determine how Taiwan uses cross-strait policy. Optimists say it is time for China to recognize political reality. That is, Beijing must accept the fact that regardless of whoever wins the presidential election next March, the Taiwanese people are determined to safeguard their sovereignty.
Pessimists, however, argue that if Chen is re-elected, it would constitute a great challenge for Beijing and pose a huge threat to cross-strait peace. A bellicose reaction to Taiwan's new leadership is expected as China tries to downgrade Chen. This approach may run the risk of deteriorating regional stability simply because Beijing cannot accept the results of a democratic election.
The conservative view, however, argues that since China is facing other controversial issues, such as the leadership succession and WTO compliance, Beijing will continue its wait-and-see approach with Chen. Changes in Taiwan's politics, in other words, will determine Beijing's policy toward Taipei. So conservatives consider, for example, whether the DPP's legislative election victory of last December and the rise of the TSU have offered some flexibility for Taipei in cross-strait relations.
It seems that Chen and his DPP have pursued the optimistic approach of dealing with China when it comes to opening direct links. As president, Chen must show his courage to break the ice with Beijing. The strategy deserves full support for it is in line with democratic principles.
For the pan-blue camp, instead of being vague on the cross-strait issue, it is imperative for Lien to speak loud and clear on what he sees as potential cross-strait solutions.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so