There have been media reports that Minister of Education Huang Jung-tsun (黃榮村) will make the proportion of graduates gaining employment a factor in univer-sity evaluations and an important factor in awarding subsidies. The reason for this is that there are too many universities and that students are having increasing difficulty finding work after they graduate. \nThe question of how employment rates should be calculated requires urgent, albeit time-consuming planning. As far as present policies are concerned, this means that the Ministry of Education will become more pragmatic in their evaluation of university achievements and that it will pay more attention to the ability of universities to directly serve and train students. Universities have reached the point where they have to pay attention to educational fundamentals. They will have to make a high rate of employability for graduates a primary goal and they will have to work hard to achieve that goal. \nTo achieve high employment rates among graduates, it is necessary to strengthen the workplace experience of both students and teachers. As far as students are concerned, the UK elevated all polytechnic schools to university status in 1992 to give more students the opportunity to attend university. Ten years on, this has resulted in both positive and negative experiences and the name "polytechnic" has disappeared. The "sandwich curriculum," however, which saw the light of day in the 1960s together with the polytechnic schools, is still in place. Traditional universities as well as non-technical and non-vocational departments also rely on such curriculums. \nThus type of curriculum could be likened to the slices of bread in a sandwich and the workplace training to the stuffing between the slices. Students can elect to only attend the three-year on-campus curriculum or they can attend the four-year on-campus curriculum paired with vocational training. \nInsightful people are more approving than condemning of the UK sandwich curriculum. They believe that a four-term year, where students transfer between the campus and the workplace every three months, would work best when implementing a system to make the transfer more convenient for students. \nAs for teachers, the number of universities of applied sciences in Germany have reached almost 50 percent of the number of institutions of higher learning, and the practical and specialized talent they train are widely welcomed in industrial circles. \nIn addition to a curriculum that stresses the resolution of practical issues by stipulating that students must have one or two terms of practical workplace training during their study period, teachers are generally required to have a minimum of five years practical experience. Some states encourage teachers to work outside the school while maintaining both position and salary in order to update their practical experience. \nThe idea that students who want to enter the workplace should also practice in the workplace is as natural as the idea that anyone who wants to learn how to swim has to get into the water. \nIf universities in Taiwan are to achieve high employment rates among their graduates, they have to adopt at least some of the following methods: \nFirst, make students' workplace and on-campus training complement each other. Second, acknowledge that only teachers with experience in the workplace are able to better understand the needs of the industry and pay attention to students' workplace training. Third, rely on workplace training to improve the success of students' job exper-ience. Fourth, technical and vocational colleges should be pioneers in achieving high employment rates among their graduates. \nLee Lung-sheng is dean of the College of Technology at National Taiwan Normal University.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the
China’s prevention of Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO and other UN specialized institutions is misleading the world. China always asserts that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 established the so-called “one China principle,” in which Taiwan is a province of China. This is fake information that is part of China’s grand external propaganda strategy. Resolution 2758 made clear that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate representative of China at the UN and its specialized institutions. However, there is not a single word related to Taiwan in the resolution, no mention of the