Keep your hat on
In contrast to Edward Lu's let-ter ("Letter,"Aug. 3, page 8) concerning the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters, I applaud that group's efforts in exercising its right to free speech to educate the people of Taiwan on the benefits of safe sex.
I met Wang Fang-ping, the collective's secretary-general,during her campaign for Taipei City Council last December and had the opportunity to discuss the collective's goals with her, something I'd be more than happy to explain to Wu.
The collective seeks to remove the stigma of sex in society. This stigma creates an environment where neither men or women are able to openly discuss issues such as family planning or sexually transmit-ted diseases without fear of scandal and self-loathing. The organization is working toward a more accepting, frank atmosphere in which sex can be discussed openly and -- most importantly -- honestly.
While many readers like Wu consider this attitude as "a sign of a lack of humility, self respect and decency," as well as the impending death of Taiwan's "ethnic Chinese society" at the hands of Western culture, I would argue that the collective's mission is actually to help the Taiwanese find their self respect through education.
With sex education glossed over in the prudish Confucian-based school system, many young Taiwanese have no idea about safe sex, or a condom's effectiveness in preventing the transmission of HIV/AIDS.
This conscious effort to keep the issue of sex education out of the public discourse for fear of "losing face" will end up harming Taiwanese society a lot more than helping it.
In 2001, the Taipei Times printed the results of a sex survey ?("Taiwanese not using condoms," Oct 15, page 4) that revealed the average sexually active person in Taiwan uses fewer than 10 condoms on an annual basis, and that over 20 percent of those who had one-night stands didn't bother using one at all.
The survey also found that two people were contracting HIV every day. It stands to reason that at least 1,460 people have since been infected with the virus that leads to AIDS.
While by no means an epidemic compared to infection rates in other countries, this number is higher than the amount of deaths caused by the recent SARS epidemic. And thanks to reactionary attitudes of cultural conservatives in Taiwan, this number will only grow in the future.
Educating the public does not guarantee responsible sexual behavior any more than a driver's license guarantees safe driving habits, but outside of forced castration it's the best thing we've got.
HIV/AIDS is out there and there is no amount of moral pontification that will make it disappear. The collective's in-your-face tactics serve only as a means to wake Taiwan up in the face of this threat.
Time and again, education has been proven to be the most effective way of dealing with sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancy and other sexual issues. This sort of frank and honest attitude cannot be classified as "immoral" or "Western" in nature. Sexual responsibility is universal.
If it takes a group of people waving condom-clad fruit in public to drive that point home, then so be it. Hats off to Wang Fang-ping and the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters for their efforts to keep our other "hats" on!
Jason Wright
Annandale, Virginia
Surrendering sovereignty
Judging from their conduct during SARS crisis, and the subsequent WHO, Kuala Lumpur incidents, the pan-blue camp has already surrendered Taiwan's sovereignty, and the people's right to self determination ("Chiang dynasty a political ruse," Aug. 13, page 8).
Who is going to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) from sneaking across the Taiwan Strait in the dark of the night or deploying a Trojan-horse strategy by flying into Taipei's Songshan airport on a passenger jet if the pan-blue camp succeeds in opening direct links? The "one China" army under the command of Lien-Soong?
Once the PLA has landed on Taiwan, would there be any way to return to democracy again?Would there be any way to avoid becoming a communist?
Taiwanese voters should ask themselves if they can trust the fate of their children and grandchildren's to the pan-blue camp -- with its surrendering attitude and disregard of "localizing" interests? Perhaps that will be the fate of Chiang's grandson -- or perhaps an even worse end -- "one country, two systems."
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS