Elections are always followed by a great variety of commentaries by people picking and choosing from the election to expound their ideas on something unrelated. The Hualien County commissioner by-election is no exception. For example, there are those making much of former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "silence," saying that it is due to the even support for the four biggest ethnic groups in Hualien, that there would be no market for Taiwan independence, and that both the blue and green camps therefore are treating Lee as a pariah.
Even though such talk isn't entirely groundless, it misses the historical aspect. Claiming that independence has a market only where ethnic Taiwanese are in majority, or that Taiwan independence is a matter of chauvinism, is really too much of an exaggeration. In fact, blue-camp candidate Hsieh Shen-shan's (
Hualien and Taitung have always been weak electoral districts for the DPP. Add to this the DPP's late decision on its candidate and reports that the party was trying to enroll a deserter from the KMT. You therefore took up his task at a difficult time, and would only have had a chance of winning had the opposition been evenly split. However, to show the sincerity of the pan-blue alliance and joint KMT-PFP ticket in next year's presidential election, the blue camp joined forces to pull Hsieh through.
Media incidents, such as attacks on the central government and inappropriate corruption investigations by police from the Ministry of the Interior, have all been bad for the DPP. It was an achievement for You even to maintain basic support. Illusions about winning were simply a matter of trying to turn unrealistic, subjective hopes into objective fact.
You, a Hualien native with an advanced education and good reputation, returned to his hometown for what could have been a moving story. However, setting up a permanent office only following several elections,he was left with little room to maneuver when opponents accused him of leaving after electoral defeats and returning before elections. There is much culture and history to develop in Hualien and Taitung, and many environmental issues to be resolved. You, a scholar and an intellectual, should have gathered friends from cultural and social circles early on, to research Hualien and Taitung history and geography, and propose more visionary and idealistic opinions. Not doing so, but issuing checks and making promises only when an election approaches, makes the claim of being public-policy oriented difficult. If it wasn't for the green banner still being ideologically legitimate in Taiwan, the election result could have been even worse.
You's defeat, however, is not the defeat of an individual. Since the DPP's ascent to power, its reform image has faded. The distribution of talented people has maintained the old system rather than being innovative, and there is an atmosphere within the party that defeat is better than sticking to ideology. The party is still doing well in some southern counties and cities where it used to be strong. But how could it break through if it is unable to ignite the passion from the tangwai (outside the KMT) era, with idealistic talented people and a reform agenda? I hope the defeat in Hualien will serve as a warning to the DPP in next year's presidential election.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow in the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS