Heat wave: it's more than just the name of the coolest disco band of the '70s, authors of the immortal Boogie Nights and The Groove Line; it's a meteorological phenomenon making life miserable here in northern Taiwan and we want to know who to blame.
"What?" you say. Isn't that up to God? (Or the gods, depending on your confession.) Good heavens, no! This is Taiwan and it is a well-known fact that in Taiwan, whatever happens, somebody in the DPP-led government must always be responsible -- at least according to the blue camp. Should lightning strike, the question of how to prevent it striking a second time always takes a back seat to the more vital one of which government minister can be pilloried by blue-camp legislators for not having the presence of mind to do something or another that is never clearly explained. Of course the legislature isn't in session now, more's the pity. If it was, it could waste huge parts of Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Ling-san's (
The government, however, is worrying about more important things. Well "thing," actually, since its only current concern is the impact of anything at all on President Chen Shui-bian's (
Veteran observers of Taiwan politics will, of course, know that the thing the government should do is to form an ad hoc committee to investigate the heat wave and at some time in this century produce a report on the topic which nobody will read. Oh, how we miss Lien Chan (
Then there is the security question. Could an evil Chinese mastermind be manipulating the weather to weaken Taiwan's defenses and hasten reunification? Will Taiwan's armed forces simply conclude that it is too hot to fight? This might sound like the plot of a Sax Rohmer novel or the movie The Avengers, but it is no wackier than a number of other things that the TSU takes seriously. Could there be any connection with so much of Taiwan's air-conditioner industry moving to China in recent years? Coincidence? We think not.
On the other hand, residents of sweltering Taipei tell us that, just as the foolish virgins in the Bible neglected to get oil for their lamps, they forgot to have the Freon, or whatever is used these days, replaced in their air conditioners and now cannot get their units serviced for love nor money. Inadequate supervision of the city's air conditioning servicing industry -- at last, a stick to beat Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS