Is economic recovery around the corner, as promised by the leaders of the G8, the group of the world's richest countries that held their annual meeting in Evian, France last week? Many economic stars are indeed aligned for recovery, both in the US and in Europe.
Oil prices are coming down from their highs during the Iraq war and, under plausible scenarios, may be heading for a greater fall. Investors all over the world are emerging from their Brazil-Enron-Iraq jitters. The risk premium is falling, pushing stock prices higher and lowering yields on long-term bonds.
Moreover, the overhang of excess capital that accumulated during the crazy high-tech boom of the 1990's has now been mostly worked out. Investment rates have been low for three years in a row. Now only a few sectors suffer from excess capital accumulation. Firms are ready to invest again.
All good news. But there, alas, the similarities between Europe and America end. Monetary and fiscal policy are working at full throttle in the US, but are muzzled in Europe.
In the US, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan did his job in 2001 and last year, aggressively cutting interest rates. When monetary policy could not do much more, the George W. Bush administration took up the charge -- and with relish.
The US budget has gone from a surplus of 1.4 percent of GDP in 2000 to a forecast deficit of 4.6 percent this year, a 6 percent swing -- of which about 5 percent is due to changes in policy rather than the weak economy. This may be fiscally irresponsible (together with the tax cuts put in place for the future, it surely is irresponsible), but in the short run, it provides an enormous boost to demand.
In Europe, however, the European Central Bank has been far more careful. True, as a new institution it has had to establish its credibility, but the result is a smaller, slower decrease in interest rates.
Fiscal policy in Europe is constrained by the Stability and Growth Pact. The budget for the euro area has gone from a surplus of 0.1 percent in 2000 to a forecast deficit of 2.4 percent for this year, nearly all of it due to the weak economy, not to changes in fiscal policy. Governments tinker at the margin, cheating a bit, and get reprimanded by the European Commission in Brussels.
In the best of scenarios, what will happen is likely to fall short of the major short-run fiscal expansion Europe needs. This would require Europe's governments to increase their deficits in the short run, while improving the long-run outlook through serious pension reform. Some governments -- most notably France and Germany -- are trying to do the second. They should feel freer to do the first.
America and Europe are not only following divergent economic policies, but their currencies are also diverging because the world is going through a major exchange-rate realignment. The dollar is depreciating, while the euro is appreciating mightily.
There is a deep and sad irony to the current depreciation of the dollar. The depreciation is the price America must pay for past sins -- i.e., a huge current-account deficit that foreign investors are no longer willing to finance, at least not at the size of 4 percent or more of US GDP. The irony is that this dollar adjustment is unambiguously good news for the US, and unambiguously bad news for Europe:
For the US, the dollar's fall means a boost to exports, and a further increase in demand, a further push for recovery. It also means a bit more inflation, but in today's world, a bit more inflation is good, not bad.
For Europe, the rising euro means lower competitiveness and further economic contraction. The effects are far from negligible: The best estimates are that a 10 percent appreciation of the euro will bring a decrease in demand and output of 0.6 percent of GDP in the euro area.
So far, the euro's appreciation is close to 30 percent from the lows of two years ago, and there is every reason to believe that even more strengthening is to come. The euro is the only currency against which the dollar can depreciate. (The last thing Japan needs is an appreciation of the yen.) It will take more than what we have seen so far to return the US current-account deficit to reasonable proportions.
With contraction and euro appreciation comes the specter of falling prices, with which Europe is already flirting. The euro's appreciation may well be the tipping factor that triggers deflation. As the now 10-year-old Japanese slump tells us, once deflation and contraction have established themselves, standard policies stop working. Europe does not want to find itself in this position.
So, the G8 leaders are half right. Between falling oil prices, aggressive fiscal and monetary policies, and the dollar's depreciation, it is hard to see what stands in the way of a strong recovery in the US. But this does not translate into recovery in Europe.
In Europe, monetary caution, self-imposed fiscal constraints and the euro's appreciation all lead to clear dangers: deflation and a prolonged slump. This is not preordained; many fundamentals in Europe are right, and a simple change in mood may spur recovery. But this is the time for strong contingency plans. Sadly, I do not see them being prepared.
Olivier Blanchard is chairman of the department of economics at MIT.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS