They marched together, fasted together and kept vigil beneath a makeshift Goddess of Democracy in Tiananmen Square before their drive to bring new freedoms to China was crushed beneath the army's tank treads.
Fast forward 14 years. The leaders of the 1989 Beijing Spring movement now live mostly in exile, their sights focused on such mundane matters as earning a living in investment consulting or Internet startups or broadcasting.
Many on China's list of the 21 most wanted students issued shortly after the June 4 crackdown say they stay involved in the cause when they can. One or two have even found ways to pursue their passion nearly full-time.
But for most of them, real-world considerations take equal priority as they reflect on a movement the violent suppression of which left hundreds dead in and around Tiananmen Square.
"They're politically active in peripheral ways," said Mickey Spiegel, a Human Rights Watch senior researcher who keeps in touch with some of the leaders. "It's hard. You're really peripheral once you're out of the country."
The winds of change that ushered in the 1989 Beijing Spring ultimately deposited many of the 21 outlaws on foreign shores.
Number two on the list was Wuer Kaixi (吾爾開希) of Beijing Normal University, who now lives in Taiwan and works in broadcasting, other students and human rights activists said.
Escape to the US
Chai Ling (柴玲), known for her passionate speeches and tearful outbursts, escaped to the US, divorced her husband, Feng Congde, a year later, and now heads a Boston-area Internet company.
Chai's former husband Feng, also on the list of 21, lives in Paris where he is preparing to defend his thesis next month as a doctoral student at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes.
Apart from his studies, the soft-spoken Feng's biggest passion is 64memo.com, his Web site containing an archive of nearly 8,000 documents about the June 4 army crackdown that put an end to the two-month-old democracy movement.
"Everyday I memorialize June 4 with my Web site," said Feng, now 37, in a telephone interview from Paris. "I can't say I have a lot of hope, but there's been a little progress. Hope is always a long way off."
Of all the student leaders, Beijing University's Wang Dan (王丹) was singled out as China's most wanted. Twice imprisoned, Wang was freed in 1998 and exiled to the US where he recently finished his second year in a doctoral program at Harvard University's history department.
Wang said he had helped to organize and participate in a series of forums and lectures on human rights, democracy and similar issues in China. He is also a director of the organization Human Rights in China.
"I'll probably need four or five years to complete my PhD, and then I hope I can return to China," Wang said in a written response to questions.
Wang and others said they were guardedly optimistic about China's new leaders, headed by recently promoted Communist Party chief and president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
"They are a little faster to react than the previous generation," said Feng. "Because of SARS, the discussion in the media has been relaxed. But real freedom of the press is still a long way off," he said.
Zhou Fengsuo, the fifth most wanted student who now works as a financial analyst in San Francisco, was less upbeat.
"Any leadership change within the party has no significance," he said. "It's the system that's corrupt in China. The hope of China will not come from inside the party."
Unrepentant
Zhou, Feng and Wang all said they had no regrets about taking part in the 1989 movement but, with the benefit of hindsight, felt they would perhaps have done some things differently.
"Personally I suffered a lot but I was still fortunate to be involved," Zhou said. "Of course I could have done some things better. I was young and naive. I did what I wanted and expressed myself. I felt like I was contributing to change in China."
Wang said his biggest regret was the loss of life when the movement was crushed.
"I have no regrets about taking part," he said. "But I am a humanist. If I had known in advance that a large number of people would die, I would not have promoted the movement as much as I did because I believe an individual's life is more important than the future of a country.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS