Nominating the members of the Council of Grand Justices is an important part of a president's job. But this year, the nomination and legislative-approval process has been completely vulgarized and politicized, tarnishing the justices' image as guardians of the Constitution.
President Chen Shui-bian (
The crux of the problem is not in the political wrangling -- it is next year's presidential election. PFP Chairman James Soong (
It should be a simple matter for the legislature to extend its spring session until the end of the month to review council nominees. The legislature has extended almost every session to review the backlog of bills. The pan-blue camp's claim that Chen sent the nominations in too late for the legislature to have sufficient time to review them is just a political excuse. The legislature decided its agenda for the rest of the session by majority vote, but they did not decide what is right and what is wrong.
If the DPP accepts the legislature's decision to delay reviewing the nominees until September, it will hand Soong control of the pan-blue camp. This is not something the ruling party wants to see. KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) leadership has suffered a setback. Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and some KMT lawmakers are also unhappy about Soong's attempts to control the pan-blue camp.
Ever since the de facto abolishment of the provincial government, Soong has not had a taste of victory and power. This may not be his motive for engineering the row, but it could create tensions between Soong and Lien.
Chen is now attempting to call an extraordinary session of the legislature despite the political risks inherent in such a move. The possible outcomes are as follows.
One, the legislature rejects the president's call and returns the nomination document to the Presidential Office, citing that it has already passed a resolution on the matter, and accusing Chen of obstructing the legislature's independence.
Two, the legislature calls a vote and vetoes the call for an extraordinary session.
Three, Chen musters a majority and the legislature convenes an extraordinary session, in which case the opposition may vent its anger on the nominees, rejecting a large number of them as a result.
Chen knows the political risks of asking an extraordinary session. Vicious partisan wrangling is detrimental to the authority of the president as well as the dignity of the Council of Grand Justices. But the DPP appears to be adopting a political approach by seeking public sympathy in light of the humiliation it has suffered. This approach may not facilitate a smooth generation of grand justices, but it will help in next year's presidential election.
Both the ruling party and the opposition are making their own political calculations and using the grand justices as sacrifices. If the politicians don't know when to stop, they will be judged by the electorate with their votes.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS