On Tuesday, the World Health Assembly (WHA) passed a resolution requiring the World Health Organization (WHO) to respond to all requests for assistance with SARS surveillance, prevention and control. A reasonable and sensible interpretation of the amendment would seem to require that the international health body respond to calls for help from Taiwan, since the new language does not require official membership.
While the move is seen by many as a belated token gesture designed to somehow make up for the discriminatory treatment and exclusion of Taiwan, the backing of the nation's allies, primarily the US and Japan, deserves the appreciation and recognition of people here.
The spread of the epidemic is at last appearing to ease. The Department of Health is even talking about the hope of being removed from the WHO's travel advisory list by the middle of the month. Yet the amendment comes too late to have much practical impact.
Taiwan needs the WHO's assistance in many areas besides the fight against SARS. For example, with the arrival of summer, other communicable diseases such as dengue fever and enterovirus, which have hit Taiwan every year around this time, are making a comeback. What if another epidemic even more lethal than SARS hits the world? Will Taiwan experience the same lack of cooperation from the WHO before receiving any help? In other words, the piecemeal remedy being offered to deal with Taiwan is no remedy at all.
This is not to mention the fact that whether the amendment's ambiguous language will be interpreted in Taiwan's favor is entirely at the discretion of the WHO director-general. Given China's record, no one should underestimate Beijing's ability to coerce an interpretation hostile toward Taiwan.
Moreover, the amendment does not allow Taiwan to play an active role in the international community to fight SARS. Having experienced a tough fight virtually on its own, surely Taiwan has much to contribute in this regard.
For the sake of the people here and around the world, the only real solution to this gap in the global disease-prevention network is at a minimum Taiwan's observer status at the WHO.
But even this well-meaning gesture from the WHA,albeit a token one, was enough to trigger a temper tantrum from China. Reportedly, Sha Zukang (
Sha went on to make a statement that is completely at odds with human-rights principles -- that nothing is more important than preserving the integrity of national territory and sovereignty, the fight against SARS included. Sha's conduct makes plain Beijing's egotism and disregard for human life. Countries that have sided with China on the issue of Taiwan's WHO observer status should be ashamed of themselves.
Another group of people in Taiwan should also be ashamed of themselves. A cross-strait videoconference convened by PFP lawmakers, which was supposed to be entirely an academic exchange on SARS, was twisted by China during the WHA meeting as evidence of its "assistance" to Taiwan. Yet these lawmakers convened another such meeting last Wednesday. With countrymen like this, who needs enemies?
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS