As a result of China's unreasonable obstruction, Taiwan failed to gain observer status at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on May 19. Chinese leaders have no conscience and are inhumane. They play with politics, preventing the Taiwanese people from getting help from the World Health Organization (WHO). This in turn has caused more than 80 Taiwan-ese to lose their lives.
I made it clear to the international media in Geneva that SARS was not invented by Taiwan. The virus was produced in China and imported to this country, inflicting great damage on Taiwanese people. Illegal Chinese migrants are still entering Taiwan, posing a threat to people's health -- so the government has to fight both SARS and illegal migrants.
Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
The head of the Department of Health and Taiwanese experts should attend SARS prevention conferences held by the WHO to provide first-hand information. If Taiwan becomes a loophole in the WHO's anti-SARS network, not only its 23 million people but the whole world will be at risk. Diseases see no national boundaries, and neither should medicine and public health.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan was quoted by his spokesperson at the WHA as saying that to save one life is to save humankind. If the WHO believes in this idea, it should not allow China to lead it by the nose because Tai-wan's accession into the WHO is not a political problem, but one related to health. It also involves humanitarianism and human rights.
Taiwan expects the WHO to dispatch more experts here to help contain the epidemic. But so far, the two visiting WHO professionals seem to have acted only as observers and collected information. They avoided contact with health authorities. We hope that WHO experts in the future can participate in anti-SARS efforts, rather than observing from the sidelines.
We were gratified that this time the US finally voiced its support for Taiwan's participation in the WHA and SARS prevention conferences. Japan also took the floor, but their statements were indirect and devious. If Japan had truly cared about people's health in East Asia, it should have confidently supported Taiwan's WHO bid and participation in the SARS prevention work.
Some EU member countries opposed Taiwan's participation at the WHA last year. Slight progress was seen this year as they did not express their opinions. We hope that EU countries can step forward and show their support next year.
The SARS outbreak may continue to escalate in China. Since the Chinese government continues to cover up the epidemic, the WHO, the US and other countries will find it difficult to offer their help. Taiwan is the victim and so is the rest of the world.
Therefore, we appeal to the international community: to help Taiwan's WHO bid is to help themselves because health truly transcends national boundaries.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS