Japan should apologize
I refer to the incident where a Mackay Memorial Hospital doctor visited Japan despite having experienced probable (albeit indirect) exposure to SARS patients. ("Diseased doctor's tour causes diplomatic trouble" May 18, 2003, Page 1)
Regrettably, the incident has been sensationalized by both the Japanese government and media alike -- without waiting for due evidence. Interestingly, the bus driver who had direct contact with the doctor has been found not to be suffering from SARS after all.
Does this not entail a reciprocal apology from the Japanese side to the people of Taiwan, who have suffered great indignation and condescension from as-yet baseless charges?
Many countries around the world have been reeling from the effects of SARS, Japan included. The unreasonable outbursts from the Japanese side clearly show a Japan that still does not have the nerve to confront the reality.
SARS originated from China, this much is irrefutable. However, clearly frustrated with their own humiliating inability to condemn China directly, the Japanese have found a convenient scapegoat in Taiwan (via this particular doctor -- an isolated incident no less) on whom to rest the blame. This is despite the fact that Taiwan has always been a loyal and true friend to Japan.
Although I have no doubt that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was right in apologizing for the incident as per international etiquette, one cannot help but desire a reciprocal gesture of friendship, civility and respect from the Japanese side.
After all, this particular doctor never had direct contact with SARS patients, nor did he exhibit SARS-like symptoms at the time of his departure -- how is the government accountable for this incident?
Even if Japan should find suspected SARS cases in the Kansai region henceforth, is it not reasonable to conclude that any number of international and/or domestic tourists in the region was/is a potential SARS carrier, including -- but certainly not limited to -- the doctor?
There are currently no barriers to entry at Japanese ports, no requests to take the temperature of inbound travellers, nor are there mandatory quarantine periods in existence. Should Japan therefore not shoulder its share of responsibility in combating the spread of SARS?
Taiwan's government and its 23 million citizens have been forced to tackle the SARS situation with little humanitarian assistance from the red-tape-bound WHO experts. The government has in place, however, some of the most stringent quarantine procedures amongst SARS-affected countries.
In our time of great difficulty and sadness, Taiwan surely deserves more than the arrogance and despicable accusations from numerous Japanese government officials and journalists.
My sincerest advice to the Japanese government and media is for those in leadership positions to grow a backbone and stand up to China, the WHO and the UN directly, if they should wish to condemn others for the SARS epidemic. Taiwan is not a pawn and will not accept being treated like one.
For our part, Taiwanese should also learn from this incident -- that we not only need to stop kowtowing to the Japanese without regard for facts, we also need to re-align issues of Taiwan's national security with the ever-deafening demands to open our country to the suspicious and clearly dishonest PRC leadership across the Strait. We need to find a safe and dignified equilibrium for the sake of our future generations.
Sadly, over 80 fellow Taiwanese have already perished at the hands of international injustice in our lone battle against SARS, more will sadly follow, but let them not die in vain.
So let us learn! Let us strengthen our resolve to find a voice of our own, not only to safeguard our safety, prosperity and national security, but especially for the love of our beautiful Formosa.
Jennifer Chen
Melbourne, Australia
Focus on real issues
Taiwan again has not been admitted to the World Health Organization (WHO) -- even though being a sovereign nation is not a requirement for membership. This doesn't feel good, but that's nothing new. The same with the UN.
But when I read in the newspaper the suggestion that in order to fight SARS, Taiwan should suspend all travel to China until Taiwan is admitted to the WHO, then I think that reason is getting hijacked by emotions.
The WHO membership and SARS are entirely different issues. We should now put the WHO membership behind us until next year and then reapply.
Concerning SARS, we should focus on the root causes of why the disease spread across the island boosting Taiwan to rank third on the worldwide list of current infections. Why have not all cases been reported properly from the beginning? Why would, and could, hospital officials conceal the threat?
Is everything being done to prevent further spreading? Do the hospitals have all the required equipment to protect doctors and nurses from contracting the disease? Do they get the relief they need?
What can be done to have more exchange for tired personnel in the hospitals? These are just a few of the questions that come to mind.
Focusing on these issues is the most professional thing to do now. I think much can be learned from answering these questions without bias.
Ralph Jensen
Kaohsiung County
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS