Today the annual World Health Assembly (WHA) convenes in Geneva. Among many crucial topics in global health, the WHA will have before it a proposal to consider inviting Taiwan to be an observer at the World Health Organization (WHO), which has been tabled repeatedly in recent years. As Taiwan, along with much of Asia, is battling the SARS epidemic, this proposal is more timely than ever.
We are very grateful that, over the years, international public opinion has gradually come to appreciate the medical necessity of our modest request. Many leading international medical associations and an increasing number of parliaments, most notably the European Parliament and the US Congress, have passed resolutions calling for Taiwan's participation, and governments of the US, Japan, and many other countries have become active in support of our cause.
At the same time, we are also grateful for the practical assistance provided and offered by the US, Japan and others in our fight to contain SARS, and for the understanding and cooperation shown by the hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals who live, work and do business in Taiwan.
The intense integration of Taiwan into the global economy has always been a source of strength and pride for us. However, it also increases the risks -- both to us and to the countries we trade with, invest in and travel to -- of the spread of newly emerging diseases.
In 1998, we suffered an outbreak of enterovirus that took the lives of 78 children which was cause for alarm for non-Taiwanese families with children. Now SARS has killed over 34 people, and it is not yet fully under control. We have been forced to impose travel restrictions on visitors from other affected areas, even as our nationals are subject to some travel restrictions abroad, to the great detriment of the prosperity of all.
In today's globalized world, it is only reasonable to assume that such outbreaks will continue to occur from time to time, and we must redouble our efforts to deal with them.
Given that diseases know no boundaries, such preparations can only be effective if they are collective, involving all countries. Unfortunately, due to non-health considerations, Taiwan has not been able to participate in the substantive programs of information sharing and coordination under the auspices of the WHO. This has left a gap in the global network of disease prevention, putting at risk our own citizens, as well as those of our neighbors and trading partners.
In both the enterovirus and SARS cases, our health authorities requested technical assistance from the WHO. In the former situation, we received no such assistance. With SARS, our calls went unanswered during the crucial first few weeks, when we had a window of opportunity to contain the outbreak. Only after our situation deteriorated dramatically late last month did the WHO send its first experts to our country.
The contrast with the response of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC) is especially noteworthy: they responded to our appeal immediately, with a substantial team of experts that provided invaluable assistance. The difference is that we have an established channel of direct communication with the USCDC, because they have been able to put aside political issues and act purely out of professional health considerations. This is what we are asking the WHO to do as well.
Unfortunately, one member state, the PRC, insists on placing political ends above global health, while the medical community in Taiwan and around the world is racing against time to save lives, Beijing has raised all manner of political objections to Taiwan's participation. It even claims that it "has always cared for the health and well-being of the Taiwanese people."
The historical record tells a rather different tale: the PRC blocked international assistance both during the enterorvirus outbreak and after the devastating 921 earthquake in 1999. During the SARS crisis, the PRC launched an international disinformation campaign about how it has assisted Taiwan, to deflect attention from the fact that it delayed WHO experts from visiting Taiwan for seven weeks, not to mention from its own failure to contain the epidemic at home. In effect, Taiwan is under "quarantine" politically.
No matter what the outcome of today's debate, steadily increasing our participation in international health mechanisms is the unwavering goal of our government. It is what we owe to our citizens, and our responsibility to the international community. We only hope that we will not have to wait until some new disease claims more lives.
Enough people have died already. The time for action is now.
Eugene Chien is the minister of foreign affairs.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Taiwan needs to step up efforts to protect its access to rare earths amid escalating geopolitical risks and global economic uncertainty, given that its export-oriented economy relies heavily on imports of the elements to produce electronics. Taiwan is not the only country facing pressure to secure stable access to rare earths — metallic elements used in artificial intelligence servers, smartphones, electric vehicles and military applications such as fighter jets — after China imposed an export licensing measure last year that threatened to cut off supplies. China is using its dominance in rare earths as a bargaining chip in its trade negotiatons
RSS