As medical workers are standing on the front line of the fight against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), there should be a consensus that "controlling the epidemic is like going to war." But, when the Executive Yuan ordered the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital to shut down on April 24, we saw some cases of irrational resistance. Some mem-bers of the media echoed the views of a few patients and their family members, as if a hospital shutdown was a major disaster. It was heartbreaking to see some reporters use inappropriate words such as "concentration camp."
Although the large-scale infection at Hoping Hospital pricked a hole in Taiwan's epidemic control strategy, our efforts still deserve approval and praise. The SARS situation is not yet critical, but the Hoping Hospital case is a lesson for public health and hygiene. At the same time, it is an opportunity for us to consider how to improve our public health IQ.
First, we should see things through other people's eyes and try to envision ourselves in their positions. Because of the unexpectedness of the quarantine, people should treat the hospital shutdown in a rational, calm manner and tolerate the temporary inconvenience. Extraordinary measures are necessary in extraordinary times.
A few days ago when reporters questioned Singapore officials about how they would respond if someone in quarantine escaped, an official gave a curt answer -- "We still have prison!" Now, it seems like it is necessary for the rule of law to come into full play.
Second, we should be on alert and treat anyone infected with the SARS virus as a forerunner of other people's possible infection. Once someone gets sick, no one can be spared from the illness in today's global village.
Prudence is a virtue. Those people in temporary quarantine must bear in mind other people's health and must remain patient in this time of difficulty. At the same time, the media should not favor sensational stories. We must treat this unfortunate event in a calm manner and absolutely not take pleasure in other people's misfortune or believe we can get away with a little luck.
Yeh Hai-yen is director of the department of philosophy at Soochow University.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the