The world's attention has been focused on the war on Iraq. But another war -- this one UN-sanctioned -- has been going on simultaneously -- the war on drugs. In my view, every sensible person should want this largely ignored war to end as well. While the UN should play a role in leading Iraq toward a free and democratic society, it must also change dramatically its own course in the war on drugs and lead the world to a saner policy.
In 1998, to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the third Convention on Narcotic and Psychotropic substances, the UN convened a special General Assembly session to discuss the issue of illicit drugs. At the end of that forum, UN member states adopted a political declaration that mandated the UN Drug Control Program (UNDCP) "to develop strategies with a view to eliminating or significantly reducing the illicit cultivation of the coca bush, the cannabis plant, and the opium poppy by the year 2008."
Today and tomorrow the international community will reconvene in Vienna to reckon with the results of the policies the UN has pursued. But five years into the program, one thing is clear -- the results are grim. According to a UNDCP report issued last year, Illicit Drug Trends, new markets for narcotics are expanding faster than old ones are being shut down. Drug dealers, like sharp businessmen everywhere, have gone out and found new markets. Eastern countries (the postcommunist world in Europe and the richer countries of Asia) are consuming more and more drugs, because the older markets of Western Europe and North America are saturated.
Across the world, narcotics trafficking is on the increase, not only because new markets are coming online, but also because new countries have taken up production. Moreover, new synthetic and chemical substances, which are more potent and often less expensive than the "classic" ones, are being invented. It is time to acknowledge that the "war on drugs" is lost -- indeed, a monumental failure -- and that hostilities should end.
Every aspect of the war strategy has failed. Harsh new domestic laws in many countries have not only failed to control the spread of drugs throughout the world, but have delivered a vast new source of state intrusiveness into the lives of millions of people. Prohibition created a pretext for authoritarian regimes to resist the abolition of the death penalty; yet even states that execute people for drug-related crimes have not been able to stem the tide. To circumvent the harsh legal regime now in place narcotics mafias have forged ever-tighter alliances with terrorist networks.
Can the world afford to continue subsidizing this failure? Can our money be wasted for much longer on fumigating Colombian valleys or arresting non-violent drug offenders? Can we -- including those of us who are elected officials -- pretend that prohibitions on illicit drugs will one day prove effective?
The answer to all these questions, of course, is: "No, we cannot." Instead, we must recognize that prohibition, rather than curtailing use, generates crime, because it makes trading in illicit drugs a lucrative business. As politicians everywhere remain loath to be seen as "soft on drugs," something must be done to call attention to this remorseless failure. One ploy taken up by some members of my Transnational Radical Party in France, Belgium, the UK and Italy has been to "denounce themselves" to their national authorities and then to disobey the prohibitionist laws by distributing drugs to passers-by during political demonstrations. By openly inviting the police to jail otherwise respected members of the community, these activists hope to show the absurdity of harsh anti-drug laws.
These Gandhian acts of non-violent civil disobedience have had an effect. Recently, 109 members of the European Parliament introduced a recommendation calling for reform of the UN Conventions on drugs. An International Anti-Prohibitionist League is now at work, calling for repeal or amendment of the UN treaties in order to allow for experimentation with legalization by individual nations.
At the upcoming Commission on Narcotics meeting in April, UN member states will have an opportunity to reassess the effectiveness of the 1998 Plan of Action. Sadly, however, the reality of its failure to come anywhere close to achieving its stated goals has not dented the minds of national governments.
But turning a blind eye to failure only increases its cost. So long as the UN anti-drug mandates remain in place, legalization of treatments, cures and drugs that today are illicit -- and recall that it was the end of prohibition alone that ended the reign of gangsters like Al Capone in the 1920s -- will remain impossible.
The Vienna meeting offers an opportunity to change course. Instead of insisting on replicating our failures, the world needs to adopt new approaches that treat the disease of drug use, instead of criminalizing it. Otherwise, we will all remain addicted to a failed drug war.
Emma Bonino is a member of the European Parliament, a former EU commissioner and a prominent member of the Transnational Radical Party.
Project Syndicate
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP